roma.repubblica.it
Rome Play Commemorates 1998 Building Collapse, Highlights Accountability Issues
A play, "Io racconto io", commemorates the 26th anniversary of the Via Vigna Jacobini building collapse in Rome, where 27 people died in 1998; the play's author lost his family in the tragedy and seeks to highlight the lack of accountability and ongoing risks of similar incidents in the city.
- What factors contributed to the Via Vigna Jacobini building collapse, and what are the current risks of similar incidents in Rome?
- The Via Vigna Jacobini building collapse resulted in a trial that concluded with no convictions and no compensation for victims' families. Fumaselli highlights the ongoing risk of similar collapses in Rome, citing an estimated 500 at-risk buildings, and the lack of maintenance as contributing factors. He aims to use the play to convey the importance of family bonds and to process his own grief.
- How does Ferruccio Fumaselli's play, "Io racconto io," provide a unique perspective on the Via Vigna Jacobini tragedy and its broader implications?
- Fumaselli's play serves as a powerful testament to the lasting impact of the tragedy and the systemic issues that contributed to it. The lack of accountability and the persistent risk of similar incidents underscore the need for increased building safety regulations and enforcement in Rome. The play's focus on family bonds in the face of tragedy provides a poignant counterpoint to the systemic failures.
- What were the immediate consequences of the Via Vigna Jacobini building collapse, and what long-term impacts have resulted from the lack of accountability?
- On December 16, 1998, a building collapse in Rome's Via Vigna Jacobini killed 27 people, including six children. Ferruccio Fumaselli, who lost his parents and two brothers in the tragedy, is staging a play, "Io racconto io", to commemorate the event and address the lack of accountability for the disaster. The play will feature various artists and will be performed on the 26th anniversary of the collapse.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative is framed strongly through the lens of Ferruccio Fumaselli's personal loss. While this provides emotional weight, it risks overshadowing the broader tragedy and the systemic issues potentially responsible for the building's collapse. The headline, if it focused solely on Fumaselli's personal story and not the wider implications, would exemplify this framing bias.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, although emotionally charged descriptions of the tragedy are to be expected given the subject matter. Words like "assordante" (deafening) and "tragica" (tragic) are used, but these are not necessarily loaded in a biased way, contributing to the emotional impact rather than a skewed presentation of facts.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the personal tragedy of Ferruccio Fumaselli and the lack of justice for the victims, but omits discussion of potential contributing factors to the building collapse beyond mentioning the lack of maintenance of other buildings. While acknowledging the 2019 ruling of no guilty parties, it doesn't delve into the details of the investigation or explore alternative explanations for the collapse. This omission might leave readers with an incomplete understanding of the event and its causes.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by implicitly framing the narrative as a simple choice between justice for the victims and the lack thereof. The complexity of investigating building collapses and the legal process is not fully explored, leaving the impression that finding someone responsible should have been straightforward.
Gender Bias
The article doesn't show overt gender bias. The victims are described without reference to gender beyond mentioning the number of children. However, it would be beneficial to include gender-disaggregated data on the victims if available, to ensure a more complete picture.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a case where the victims of a building collapse received no compensation, illustrating inequality in access to justice and resources. The lack of accountability and redress for the families exemplifies systemic inequalities. The fact that a new building was constructed on the same site without providing the requested community space further underscores this inequality.