lemonde.fr
Rosenfeld's "The Age of Choice": Redefining Freedom
Historian Sophia Rosenfeld's "The Age of Choice" examines the modern Western conception of freedom as "freedom-as-choice," tracing its origins to shifts in social practices and contrasting it with historical views that emphasized aligning will with virtue.
- What historical shifts in social practices and everyday life contributed to the rise of the contemporary understanding of freedom as the ability to choose among various options?
- Rosenfeld traces the emergence of "freedom-as-choice" to shifts in everyday life and social practices, not solely to theoretical changes. The rise of consumerism and democratic voting systems, extending the choice model to all life aspects, solidified this modern view of freedom. This contrasts with past conceptions where freedom involved aligning will with moral principles, as illustrated by the Herculean choice allegory.
- How does Rosenfeld's analysis of "freedom-as-choice" challenge conventional understandings of liberty in the Western world, and what are the immediate implications for political thought?
- In her new book, "The Age of Choice," historian Sophia Rosenfeld argues that the dominant conception of freedom in the Western world has narrowed to "freedom-as-choice," equating liberty with the ability to select among options, from consumer goods to political candidates. This contrasts with historical views of freedom, such as the early modern understanding of freedom as aligning one's will with virtue.
- What are the potential limitations or overlooked aspects of defining freedom primarily as the capacity for individual choice, and what are the long-term consequences of this perspective for society and politics?
- Rosenfeld's analysis suggests that the contemporary emphasis on choice as freedom has significant implications. By focusing on individual preferences, it potentially overlooks other vital aspects of liberty, such as social justice or freedom from oppression. Future research should explore how this narrow definition shapes political discourse and policy.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the author's argument about the contemporary understanding of freedom as choice, presenting this perspective as the dominant and somewhat problematic view. The historical examples are used to support this central argument, shaping the reader's understanding towards the author's critique.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although the phrasing consistently highlights the author's view on the limitations of "freedom-as-choice." Words like "reduced", "tend", and "contrairement" subtly guide the reader towards the author's perspective. However, these instances are not overtly charged or manipulative.
Bias by Omission
The provided text focuses heavily on the author's perspective and the evolution of the concept of freedom as choice, potentially neglecting alternative viewpoints on freedom and its interpretations. While the text mentions the historical context, it may lack a comprehensive analysis of differing historical conceptions of freedom beyond the Herculean allegory. Further, it does not consider non-Western perspectives on freedom.
False Dichotomy
The text presents a dichotomy between the modern understanding of freedom as choice and historical conceptions, potentially oversimplifying the evolution of the idea of freedom. It doesn't explore the possibility of coexisting or overlapping interpretations of freedom throughout history.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses how the dominant conception of freedom as choice has evolved, impacting political and social spheres. While not directly addressing inequality, understanding this dominant concept is crucial for analyzing its potential effects on equitable access to choices and opportunities. A focus on "freedom as choice" could indirectly influence policy discussions on equitable access to resources and opportunities, impacting inequality if choices are not equally accessible to all.