nytimes.com
Row Z: Absurdities in Football
This article discusses various oddities in football, including players' unrealized European dreams, Daniel Levy's legacy at Tottenham, and Thomas Tuchel's struggles with England's national team energy.
- What are some of the most notable absurdities highlighted in the article?
- The article highlights the exclusion of Nottingham Forest's Omari Hutchinson and Jair Cunha from their Europa League squad despite their pre-signing excitement about playing in Europe. Chelsea's Facundo Buonanotte faced a similar fate, being excluded from their Champions League squad shortly after expressing his enthusiasm for the competition.
- How is Daniel Levy's legacy at Tottenham Hotspur portrayed, and what significant details are mentioned?
- Levy's legacy is viewed as a mixed bag: positive aspects include a new stadium, improved training facilities, consistent European qualification, sound finances, and even hosting Beyoncé concerts. However, his tenure is also criticized for only two trophies in 24 years and his initial support of the European Super League, a decision Tottenham later reversed. His plan to move the stadium to Stratford is also highlighted as an alternative that didn't happen.
- What was the recurring issue highlighted in Thomas Tuchel's management of the England national team, and how did he address it?
- A recurring issue during Tuchel's tenure was the lack of energy displayed by the players. He consistently pointed out this deficiency following matches, blaming the players' lack of urgency and runs off the ball. However, after repeatedly criticizing the players, he shifted blame to the crowd in one instance, calling the atmosphere different and less supportive compared to Premier League crowds.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article uses a humorous and sarcastic tone, framing the described events as absurd and preposterous. This framing, while entertaining, might overshadow the seriousness of some issues like the financial implications of stadium construction and the ethical questions surrounding the European Super League. The headline, "Row Z: The Bonkers Side of the Game," sets this tone from the start. The repeated use of words like "scoundrels," "absurdities," and "preposterousness" reinforces this comedic framing.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as "scoundrels," "giddy, gleeful delight," and "Chelsea gonna Chelsea." These phrases carry strong connotations and inject subjective opinions into what could be presented as more neutral reporting. For example, describing Forest's actions as "Forest, you scoundrels" is opinionated rather than objective. Neutral alternatives would be to simply state the facts of the player exclusions without the added judgment.
Bias by Omission
The article omits discussion of the potential reasons behind the clubs' decisions to exclude players from European squads. There could be tactical reasons, injury concerns, or other factors not mentioned that provide context. Omitting these perspectives could lead to a misinterpretation of the clubs' actions as purely capricious or malicious. The article also focuses primarily on the negative aspects of Daniel Levy's legacy at Tottenham while overlooking potential positive contributions beyond what is explicitly mentioned.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy regarding Daniel Levy's legacy at Tottenham, simplifying it to "good" (stadium, financial stability) versus "bad" (lack of trophies). This ignores the complexities of long-term club management and the various factors influencing success in football. It does not account for the challenges Levy faced or the long-term strategic vision that may have influenced some decisions.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the significant cost of attending Tottenham Hotspur matches, with season tickets reaching £1,291 and the cheapest seats at £856. This creates a barrier to access for many fans, exacerbating socioeconomic inequalities and making the sport less inclusive. The discussion of Daniel Levy's potential move of the stadium to Stratford also indirectly relates to the SDG by questioning the accessibility of the new stadium location for fans and the lack of consideration for the emotional impact on the community.