lemonde.fr
RSF Appoints Rival Prime Minister in Sudan, Deepening Civil War
On July 26th, 2024, Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) named Mohamed Hassan Al-Ta'ayshi as prime minister of a rival government, further dividing the country, with the army controlling the north and the RSF controlling parts of the west and south, amidst a brutal civil war that began over two years ago.
- What are the long-term implications of the RSF's actions for the stability and future governance of Sudan?
- The appointment of a rival prime minister and presidential council indicates a hardening of positions in the Sudanese conflict. This move likely signals a protracted conflict, jeopardizing international efforts to achieve a ceasefire and establishing a unified government. The presence of two rival governors in Darfur underscores the severe fragmentation of authority within the country.
- What is the immediate impact of the RSF's appointment of a rival prime minister on the ongoing conflict in Sudan?
- The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan appointed Mohamed Hassan Al-Ta'ayshi as prime minister of a rival government, ignoring the internationally recognized government. This action, announced on July 26th, 2024, represents an escalation in the ongoing conflict. The RSF also unveiled a 15-member presidential council, headed by RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo.
- How does the RSF's establishment of a parallel government affect the existing power structure and international efforts to resolve the conflict?
- This announcement follows a February political charter signed in Nairobi between the RSF and allied groups, solidifying their efforts to establish a parallel administration. The move further divides Sudan, with the army controlling the north, east, and center, and the RSF controlling parts of Darfur and Kordofan. This division highlights the deep political fracture within Sudan.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes the RSF's actions as a significant development, potentially giving undue weight to their parallel government. The headline and lead paragraph focus on the RSF's announcement, before delving into the broader context of the ongoing conflict. This could lead readers to overestimate the legitimacy or power of the RSF's government compared to the internationally recognized government.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, employing terms like "parallel government" and "rival government." However, descriptions such as "brutal war" and references to "attacks that have killed hundreds" are inherently loaded and emotive, potentially swaying the reader's perception of the RSF's actions. More neutral language, such as "armed conflict" and "reported deaths," would be more objective.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the actions of the RSF and their newly formed government, but omits details regarding the perspectives and potential responses of the civilian population affected by the conflict. The article also lacks in-depth analysis of international community's response and potential sanctions against the RSF's actions. The impact of this parallel government on humanitarian aid efforts and the civilian population is not fully explored.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the army-led government and the RSF-led government. It doesn't fully explore the complexities of alliances, shifting allegiances, and the potential for internal divisions within both groups. The narrative implicitly frames the situation as a clear-cut conflict between two sides, neglecting the nuances of the various factions and their motivations.
Gender Bias
The article lacks specific details about gender representation within the RSF government or the wider conflict. There is no explicit mention of women's roles in either government or the affected communities. This omission prevents a comprehensive understanding of how the conflict impacts different genders.
Sustainable Development Goals
The ongoing conflict in Sudan, marked by the formation of rival governments by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudanese army, severely undermines peace, justice, and strong institutions. The establishment of parallel governments and the appointment of rival governors demonstrate a breakdown of governance and the rule of law, exacerbating instability and hindering efforts towards peace and reconciliation. The conflict itself has caused immense suffering and displacement, further obstructing the progress towards establishing strong, accountable institutions.