repubblica.it
Rumiz's New Series: Reclaiming Europe's Mythical Identity
Paolo Rumiz's 14-volume book series, starting with "Verranno di notte", counters the narrative of European decline by exploring its mythical roots and critiquing the current political climate characterized by rising nationalism and demonization of migrants. The series, available in Italy, aims to inspire a renewed sense of shared European purpose.
- What is the central argument of Paolo Rumiz's new book series on Europe, and what is its significance in the current political climate?
- Paolo Rumiz, a renowned Italian journalist and writer, has released a 14-volume collection exploring Europe's identity, starting with "Verranno di notte", focusing on the resurgence of barbarism. The series, available in Italy, aims to rediscover Europe's mythical roots and counter the prevailing narrative of decline.
- How does Rumiz's call to rediscover Europe's mythological roots relate to his criticism of the current political and intellectual climate?
- Rumiz argues that Europe's political narrative needs a mythical foundation, referencing the abduction of Europa by Zeus as a symbol of migration and peace. He criticizes the current political climate, marked by hardening mentalities, demonization of migrants, and a lack of inspiring leadership, advocating for a narrative that appeals to emotion.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of the current political trends in Europe, and how can the narrative proposed by Rumiz help counter them?
- Rumiz warns against the self-fulfilling prophecy of European decline, prevalent even on the left. He emphasizes the need for a counter-narrative that engages emotions and contrasts with the purely rational responses, noting the current absence of leaders capable of conveying a sense of shared European purpose.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the discussion around Rumiz's book and his perspective. Headlines and the introduction strongly emphasize his call for a more emotionally resonant narrative about Europe. This framing might inadvertently prioritize his views over potentially equally valid or contrasting perspectives on the subject. The emphasis on the book's release in the introduction could also be considered a form of framing bias.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although terms like "demonization" and "barbarie" carry strong connotations. While these terms accurately reflect Rumiz's perspective, the article could benefit from including more context or alternative word choices to maintain a higher degree of neutrality. For example, instead of 'barbarie', the author could have used 'brutality' or 'violence'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Paolo Rumiz's perspective and his new book, potentially omitting other viewpoints on the state of European ideals and the challenges it faces. While the article mentions opposing views (e.g., the rise of nationalism), it doesn't delve deeply into alternative analyses or solutions. This omission could limit the reader's ability to form a fully informed opinion.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between reason and emotion, suggesting that a purely rational approach to countering populism is insufficient. While this is a valid point, the framing could benefit from acknowledging the complexities of effective political communication and the potential pitfalls of relying solely on emotional appeals.
Gender Bias
The article mentions the myth of Europa, a woman, as a central theme. While this is relevant to Rumiz's argument, there is no further analysis of gender representation in European politics or society. The lack of discussion on gendered aspects of the political landscape could be considered an omission.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the rise of nationalism, demonization of migrants, and a potential balkanization of Europe, all of which negatively impact peace, justice, and strong institutions. The author expresses concern over the lack of a compelling narrative countering these trends, hindering efforts to build stronger institutions and promote peace. The absence of emotional connection to European ideals among politicians is also highlighted as a contributing factor.