tass.com
Russia Condemns US Sanctions Against Cuba
Russia strongly condemns the US decision to keep Cuba on its list of state sponsors of terrorism, calling it an illegal and cruel pressure tactic that violates UN principles and aims to economically suffocate the independent nation; Russia supports the immediate lifting of the US embargo on Cuba.
- What is the immediate impact of the US decision to maintain Cuba on the list of state sponsors of terrorism?
- Russia condemns the US's continued listing of Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism, calling it an illegal and cruel means of pressure. This action violates UN principles and is a blatant attempt to economically suffocate Cuba, according to Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova. Russia supports the immediate lifting of the US trade and financial blockade against Cuba.
- How does Russia's condemnation of the US policy toward Cuba connect to broader patterns of US foreign policy?
- The US justification for Cuba's inclusion on the list—the alleged refusal to extradite Colombian rebels—is considered irrelevant and outdated by Russia. Zakharova highlights Cuba's exemplary counter-terrorism efforts, recognized by much of the global community. This US policy is seen by Russia as a broader pattern of using unilateral sanctions to intimidate and punish 'disobedient' nations.
- What are the potential long-term implications of the US's continued use of sanctions against Cuba and other 'disobedient' nations?
- Russia predicts that despite US pressure, Cuba will continue developing its foreign economic ties. This situation underscores a larger trend of the US using unilateral sanctions as a core element of its foreign policy, targeting nations deemed 'disobedient'. Russia's continued support for Cuba signals a broader push for a multipolar world order that resists such actions.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing heavily favors the Russian perspective, portraying the US actions as solely driven by a desire for regime change. The headline and introduction immediately position the reader to view the US policy negatively. Zakharova's statements are presented without significant challenge or counterpoint.
Language Bias
The article uses strong, negative language to describe US actions, such as "cruel," "illegitimate," and "treacherously." These loaded terms shape the reader's perception. Neutral alternatives could include 'harsh,' 'controversial,' and 'interfering.' The repeated use of "illegitimate" and "cruel" reinforces the negative framing.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Russia's condemnation of US policy towards Cuba and omits perspectives from the US government or other nations on why Cuba remains on the list of state sponsors of terrorism. The rationale behind the US decision and potential counterarguments are absent, limiting the reader's ability to form a complete understanding.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the situation as a simple choice between supporting Cuba's independence and succumbing to US pressure. It ignores the possibility of nuanced approaches or alternative solutions to the complex issues surrounding Cuba's relations with the US.
Sustainable Development Goals
The US embargo on Cuba significantly impacts the Cuban economy, limiting access to resources and hindering economic development. This negatively affects poverty reduction efforts on the island. The quote "Washington is ready to resort to any methods, to treacherously interfere in the internal affairs of a sovereign country, to subject its population to destitution" directly supports this.