pda.kp.ru
Russia Prevents 190 Terrorist Attacks in 2024
Russian security services thwarted 190 terrorist plots in 2024, including six by groups targeting schools and crowds, neutralized 38, and detained over 1,700 individuals; the FSB director linked this to Western support for Ukraine and online propaganda.
- What are the main causes of the increase in terrorist threats and criminal activities reported by the FSB?
- The increase in terrorist activity is attributed to the West's support for Ukraine, providing them with weapons enabling attacks deep into Russian territory. International terrorist organizations are targeting migrant workers and youth, while Western intelligence services are accused of conducting anti-Russian propaganda and recruitment. Over 120,000 pieces of terrorist content were removed online.
- What is the extent of Russia's success in preventing terrorist attacks in 2024, and what specific actions were taken?
- In 2024, Russian security forces prevented 190 terrorist attacks, including 6 planned by members of the "Maniacs Cult of Killers" and "Columbine" groups targeting educational institutions and public places. They neutralized 38 and detained over 1,700 bandits and accomplices. Over 2,700 weapons-related crimes were prevented, resulting in the seizure of 100,000+ firearms and 5,500+ explosive devices.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of the current security situation and counter-terrorism strategies employed by Russia?
- The long-term implications include the continuation of a heightened security posture within Russia, potential for further escalation of conflict with Ukraine and its Western backers, and increased surveillance and censorship to counter online propaganda. The effectiveness of these counter-terrorism measures remains to be fully assessed.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing heavily favors the Russian perspective. The headline (if there were one) would likely emphasize the successes of the security services in thwarting attacks. The use of strong language like "neutralized" and "bandits" paints a picture of decisive action against clear threats, without offering a nuanced view of the situation. The introduction of the 'collective West' as the source of the problem steers the narrative towards an external enemy.
Language Bias
The language used is highly charged and emotionally loaded. Terms like "bandits," "terrorists," and "neutralized" present a negative and biased portrayal of the individuals and groups involved. The description of the West's actions as "unprecedented resource support" is strongly accusatory. More neutral terms like "individuals suspected of terrorism," "militants," and "those involved in the conflict" could be used instead.
Bias by Omission
The report focuses heavily on the actions of Russian security forces and downplays potential contributing factors or alternative perspectives on the rise in terrorist activities. The lack of context regarding the political and social climate, and potential grievances that might fuel extremism, presents a biased picture.
False Dichotomy
The report presents a false dichotomy by portraying a simplistic 'us vs. them' narrative, where Russia is solely defending itself against external threats. It ignores the complexities of the geopolitical situation and the possibility of internal factors influencing the rise in terrorism.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the prevention of 190 terrorist attacks, the neutralization of 38 bandits, and the detention of over 1,700 bandits and accomplices. These actions directly contribute to strengthening institutions and ensuring peace and security. The prevention of terrorist attacks in educational institutions and public places is particularly relevant to SDG 16.1, which aims to significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates.