Russia Strikes Dnipro with New Ballistic Missile

Russia Strikes Dnipro with New Ballistic Missile

dw.com

Russia Strikes Dnipro with New Ballistic Missile

Ukraine reports Russia used a new ballistic missile in a strike on Dnipro, while Russia claims it was a successful test of a hypersonic missile.

Ukrainian
Germany
RussiaMilitaryRussia Ukraine WarUkraineConflictMilitary TechnologyMissile Strike
Ukrainian Intelligence Agency (Гур)Russian MilitaryMoscow Institute Of Thermal TechnologyScientific And Production Center "Titan-Barricades"Main Special Design Bureau "Prozhektor"Concern "Constellation"Scientific And Production Enterprise "Specenergo Mechanics"Scientific Research Center For Special Technology And Conversion "Continent"Us Department Of Defense
Vladimir Putin
What organizations were involved in the development and testing of this missile system?
The "Kedr" missile system's development involved six Russian defense companies, and testing occurred in October 2023 and June 2024. The flight time from Astrakhan to Dnipro was 15 minutes, and the missile reached speeds exceeding 11 Mach.
What type of missile did Russia use in the attack on Dnipro, and what are its key characteristics?
Ukraine's intelligence agency reported that Russia used a new ballistic missile, likely from the mobile missile system "Kedr," to strike Dnipro. The missile had six warheads, each with six submunitions.
What are the differing narratives from Russia, Ukraine, and the United States concerning this missile strike?
While Russia claimed the strike targeted a missile factory and was a successful test of the "Oreshnik" hypersonic missile, Ukrainian reports stated there were no significant consequences from the attack. The US Department of Defense confirmed that an experimental medium-range missile, based on the RS-26 "Rubezh" ICBM, was used.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The framing emphasizes the new missile technology and its capabilities while downplaying the potential impact of the strike, suggesting a focus on military aspects rather than humanitarian concerns.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used in describing the strike and the missile's capabilities is relatively neutral, but there is an implied bias toward the Ukrainian account due to the prominent placement of their intelligence findings.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article primarily focuses on Ukrainian intelligence's perspective, omitting potential counterarguments or alternative explanations from Russia or other international sources. This creates a potentially one-sided narrative.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a dichotomy between the Ukrainian and Russian narratives of the missile strike, implying a clear-cut truth rather than a complex situation with potential ambiguities.