dw.com
Russia Uses Victory Day Parade to Project International Support Amid Ukraine War
Russia's Victory Day parade on May 9th features North Korean military personnel and leaders from over 20 countries, including sanctioned nations, in an attempt to demonstrate broad international support amid the war in Ukraine, while simultaneously commissioning 150 million rubles worth of propaganda linking the current conflict to WWII.
- How is Russia using the 80th anniversary of Victory Day to shape its international image and deflect criticism surrounding its war in Ukraine?
- Russia is leveraging the 80th anniversary of Victory Day to bolster its image amid the war in Ukraine, inviting leaders from sanctioned countries to create an "anti-West" coalition. The participation of North Korean military personnel, previously denied by Russia, underscores this effort to showcase international support.
- What is the significance of North Korean military participation in the Victory Day parade, and how does it reflect Russia's broader geopolitical strategy?
- This year's Victory Day parade aims to project an image of broad international support for Russia, despite the war in Ukraine. The presence of leaders from sanctioned nations like Venezuela, Cuba, and North Korea, alongside major players like China and Brazil, serves as a counterpoint to Western condemnation.
- What are the potential long-term implications of Russia's attempt to create an "anti-West" coalition through Victory Day celebrations, and how might this impact future international relations?
- The Kremlin's increased spending on Victory Day celebrations (approximately 5 billion rubles, exceeding last year's 2.7 billion) demonstrates a calculated attempt to shift domestic and international narratives. The strategic use of historical parallels between World War II and the war in Ukraine, alongside commissioned propaganda videos, reinforces this narrative.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the event largely from the Kremlin's perspective, emphasizing its efforts to create an "anti-Western coalition" and present a positive image. The headline and the focus on the guest list and Russia's attempts at international image-building heavily favor this perspective. While opposing views are mentioned, the framing overwhelmingly focuses on Russia's actions and goals, which may unduly influence the reader's interpretation of the event's significance and purpose.
Language Bias
The article employs largely neutral language but occasionally uses terms that could be seen as subtly favoring one side. For example, the description of Russia's actions as creating an "anti-Western coalition" frames the event within a specific geopolitical context. Similarly, using words like "propaganda" when describing Russian media outlets might carry a negative connotation and should be considered.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the Kremlin's perspective and actions, potentially omitting counter-narratives or perspectives from Ukraine and other countries critical of Russia's actions. The article mentions some dissenting voices but doesn't fully explore the breadth of international opinion on the matter. The lack of detailed information on the economic costs of the celebrations and their impact on the Russian population might also be considered an omission. The impact on the Russian people and the ongoing conflict are largely sidelined in favor of the political maneuvering surrounding the event. There is a lack of in-depth analysis of the motivations of countries who choose to participate in the parade.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between a pro-Russia and anti-Russia camp, overlooking the nuances of international relations and the diverse range of opinions within individual countries. Many countries may not be actively supporting Russia but neither are they staunchly against it, occupying a more neutral space which is not fully explored.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights Russia's attempt to use the Victory Day celebrations to legitimize its war in Ukraine and create an "anti-Western coalition". This action undermines international peace and justice, exacerbating geopolitical tensions and potentially hindering efforts towards conflict resolution. The significant military spending on the Victory Day celebrations, exceeding previous years, further demonstrates the prioritization of military might over peaceful conflict resolution. The use of historical parallels to justify current aggression also distorts historical narratives and promotes a revisionist view of conflict.