dw.com
Russia Uses Victory Day Parade to Showcase "Anti-West" Alliance
Russia's Victory Day parade on May 9th, 2025, features North Korean troops and leaders from sanctioned countries, aiming to portray an "anti-Western" alliance and downplay the war in Ukraine, with potential US involvement discussed.
- How does the participation of North Korean troops affect Russia's narrative regarding the war in Ukraine?
- Russia's use of the Victory Day parade to bolster its international image reflects a shift in emphasis from the horrors of war to showcasing strength and dominance. The presence of leaders from sanctioned countries signifies an attempt to create a new "anti-Western coalition", countering Russia's international isolation. The decreased attendance of BRICS nations underscores the limited scope of this coalition.
- What is the primary goal of Russia's invitation of leaders from sanctioned countries to the Victory Day parade?
- To commemorate the 80th anniversary of the victory over Nazism, Russia is hosting a military parade in Moscow, inviting leaders from sanctioned countries like North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, and Myanmar, aiming to project an image of an "anti-Western majority". This year's parade includes North Korean troops, despite Russia's previous denials of their involvement in the Ukraine conflict. The event is intended to demonstrate Russia's international support.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of Russia using the Victory Day parade to legitimize its actions in Ukraine and construct a new international coalition?
- The future implications of this event suggest a potential divergence in global alliances and a further polarization of international relations. The parade's strategic significance hinges on its ability to reshape Russia's global image, influence perceptions of the war in Ukraine, and potentially attract new allies. Russia's increased spending on the event highlights its importance to domestic and international narratives.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames Russia's actions as an attempt to build an "anti-Western majority," emphasizing the Kremlin's perspective and portraying the participation of various nations as support for this narrative. Headlines and the article's structure prioritize this interpretation, potentially shaping reader understanding toward viewing Russia's actions as part of a broader geopolitical struggle rather than an act of aggression. The potential presence of a US representative is presented as a diplomatic breakthrough for Russia, which might be an overly positive framing of the situation.
Language Bias
The article largely maintains a neutral tone but uses certain phrases that subtly favor the Kremlin's perspective. For example, describing Russia's actions in Ukraine as a "special military operation" rather than an invasion frames the conflict in a more favorable light. The use of phrases such as "alternative international coalition" and "anti-Western majority" present a biased viewpoint by framing Russia's actions in a more politically acceptable way. Neutral alternatives could include 'coalition of nations' and 'group of nations'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the Kremlin's perspective and actions, potentially omitting counter-narratives or perspectives from Ukraine and other nations critical of Russia's actions. The analysis also lacks details on the specific content of the "patriotic" videos and programs commissioned by the Moscow region, limiting a full understanding of their potential bias. While acknowledging space constraints, the lack of diverse viewpoints weakens the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified dichotomy between a pro-Russia and anti-Russia coalition, neglecting the complexities of international relations and the varied positions of different nations. Many countries may not align entirely with either side, and the article doesn't explore those nuances. The portrayal of a clear "new non-aligned movement" might oversimplify the motivations and positions of participating nations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights Russia's attempt to use the Victory Day celebrations to legitimize its war in Ukraine and build an "anti-Western coalition." This action undermines international peace and justice, and the strong institutions meant to prevent such conflicts. The event is framed as a demonstration of support for Russia's actions, despite international condemnation. The significant spending on propaganda further emphasizes the distortion of historical events for political purposes.