Russian Court Liquidates Royzman Foundation After Fundraising Audit

Russian Court Liquidates Royzman Foundation After Fundraising Audit

dw.com

Russian Court Liquidates Royzman Foundation After Fundraising Audit

A Russian court liquidated the Royzman Foundation, a charity founded by former Yekaterinburg mayor Yevgeny Royzman, following a Ministry of Justice audit of its 2021-2022 fundraising campaign for Zolgensma, which raised 222 million rubles, with over 131 million rubles remaining after the campaign ended due to government intervention.

Russian
Germany
PoliticsJusticeRussiaCensorshipCharityLiquidationЕвгений РойзманФонд Ройзмана
Фонд РойзманаМинюстКруг ДобраМедиазонаIt's My City1-Я Детская Больница Екатеринбурга
Евгений РойзманаВладимир ПутинСветлана Косолапова
What broader implications does the liquidation of the Royzman Foundation have for freedom of expression, charitable activity, and political dissent in Russia?
This legal action reflects broader tensions between independent charities and the Russian government. The Royzman Foundation's closure, combined with Royzman's criminal charges for criticizing the war in Ukraine, suggests increased state control over civil society and dissent. This may signal a trend of restricting independent fundraising and charitable activities.
What are the immediate consequences of the Oktyabrsky District Court's decision to liquidate the Royzman Foundation, and how does this affect Russian charities?
The Oktyabrsky District Court of Yekaterinburg liquidated the Royzman Foundation, a charity founded by former Yekaterinburg mayor Yevgeny Royzman. The liquidation follows a 2024 audit by the Ministry of Justice, focusing on a 2021-2022 fundraising campaign for Zolgensma, a drug costing over \$2 million per dose. The campaign ended after the creation of the government's "Circle of Goodness" fund, changing the drug's provision.
What were the key financial aspects of the Royzman Foundation's Zolgensma fundraising campaign, and how did the government's intervention influence the outcome?
The case highlights the complexities of crowdfunding for expensive medicines in Russia. The Royzman Foundation raised 222 million rubles, with over 131 million remaining after the campaign's closure. 88 million rubles were used for a nursing home, with the remaining funds held pending donor requests, a point disputed by the Ministry of Justice.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The headline and introduction immediately highlight the closure of the foundation due to a lawsuit. This framing prioritizes the negative outcome and legal battle over the foundation's charitable activities and the positive impact it had on the lives of the children with SMA. The sequence of events emphasizes the legal issues and allegations over the foundation's attempts to help.

3/5

Language Bias

The article uses language that leans towards portraying the foundation negatively. Words and phrases such as "interested," "funds remained in the accounts," and "did not immediately announce" create a sense of suspicion and lack of transparency, while not providing alternative interpretations or explanations. Neutral alternatives might include describing the funds as "unspent" instead of implying concealment.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the legal action against the Roizman Foundation and the Ministry of Justice's claims, but omits details about the Foundation's overall history of charitable work beyond a single sentence. It doesn't mention the number of people helped, the types of assistance given, or any positive feedback from beneficiaries. This omission creates a one-sided narrative.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the situation as either the Foundation's misuse of funds or the Ministry of Justice's justified actions. It does not explore alternative explanations, such as bureaucratic inefficiencies or unforeseen complications arising from the government's changing policies on Zolgensma distribution.

2/5

Gender Bias

The article mentions the mothers of the children, and while not overtly sexist, it focuses more on the actions and statements of male figures (Roizman, representatives of the Ministry of Justice) than on the experiences of the mothers and other potentially involved female figures. This imbalance might subtly reinforce the prevalence of men in power.

Sustainable Development Goals

Good Health and Well-being Positive
Direct Relevance

The Royzman Foundation initially raised funds for Zolgensma, a life-saving drug for children with SMA. Although the fundraising was later stopped due to government intervention, both children eventually received the necessary treatment. The foundation also directed funds towards building a hospice for cancer patients, further contributing to health and well-being.