dw.com
Russian Economy Slows Amid High Military Spending, Civilian Sector Recession
Russia's economy is slowing despite high military spending in 2023 and 2024, causing a recession in civilian sectors due to high interest rates and reduced lending. The Center for Macroeconomic Analysis and Short-Term Forecasting (CMASP) reports a decline in civilian production, reaching its lowest point since April 2023.
- How do high interest rates contribute to the decline in civilian production in Russia, and which specific sectors are most affected?
- The slowdown is most pronounced in civilian sectors serving the consumer market, experiencing a recession driven by high interest rates, reduced lending, and weakened consumer demand. The CMASP, with close ties to the government, suggests that January-March 2025 civilian production fell 0.8% month-on-month. This mirrors the impact of the 2022 Ukraine invasion, affecting sectors like food processing, metallurgy, and automotive industries.
- What is the primary driver of the current economic slowdown in Russia, and what are its immediate consequences for civilian sectors?
- The Russian economy is slowing, with growth fueled primarily by military spending in 2023 and 2024. While some sectors recovered from the 2022 recession, the Center for Macroeconomic Analysis and Short-Term Forecasting (CMASP) reports a decline in civilian production, reaching its lowest point since April 2023. This contraction is attributed to factors like high interest rates, hindering business activity.
- What are the long-term implications of the current economic trends in Russia, considering the government's reluctance to address the impact of military spending on civilian production?
- Continued economic contraction in Russia is linked to high military spending, creating an imbalance between government outlays and insufficient civilian production. The government's focus on military expenditure and reluctance to acknowledge the war's impact prevent a return to balanced growth, hindering efforts to lower interest rates and boost consumer demand. This creates a vicious cycle of reduced production, increased prices, and further economic slowdown.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the economic slowdown negatively, emphasizing the decline in civilian sectors and the challenges faced by businesses. The headline and introduction contribute to this negative framing. While it mentions government explanations, the overall tone suggests a more critical perspective on the official narrative.
Language Bias
The article uses words like "unpleasant," "stagnation," "recession," and "capitulaion" to describe the economic situation, creating a negative tone. Phrases like "forbidden words" and "enchanted circle" add dramatic effect, potentially swaying the reader's perception. More neutral terms could be used to describe the economic data, for example, instead of "capitulaion", a more neutral term such as "struggle for competitiveness" could be used.
Bias by Omission
The article omits discussion of potential positive economic factors unrelated to military spending, and the long-term effects of the high interest rate policy. It also doesn't explore alternative economic strategies beyond reducing military spending. The reliance on a single source (ЦМАКП) which has close ties to the government raises concerns about potential bias by omission of opposing viewpoints.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by suggesting that the only way to achieve balanced growth is by reducing military spending. Other economic policies and structural reforms are not explored as potential solutions.
Gender Bias
The article focuses on the statements of male economists and officials (e.g., Sergey Alexashenko, the Belousov brothers, and Kirill Tremasov). While Elvira Nabiullina is mentioned, her views are summarized rather than directly quoted. The analysis lacks a focus on how gender might affect economic outcomes or perspectives within the reported situation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a decline in the Russian economy, particularly in civilian sectors. The stagnation and recession in non-military industries directly impact employment, economic growth, and overall well-being. High interest rates, meant to curb inflation, further stifle economic activity and limit business investment, leading to reduced job opportunities and hindering economic development. The reliance on military spending for economic growth is unsustainable and detrimental to long-term economic health.