dw.com
Russia's Online Harassment Campaign Targets EU President von der Leyen
Following a suspected GPS interference incident, Russian online attacks against European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen intensified, fueled by her pro-Ukraine stance and perceived threat to Russia's interests.
- What triggered the surge in online attacks against Ursula von der Leyen in Russia?
- A suspected deliberate interference with the GPS system of von der Leyen's plane, causing an unscheduled landing in Bulgaria on August 31, 2025, is believed to have exacerbated existing anti-EU sentiment in Russia, leading to a wave of online harassment targeting the EU President.
- What are the broader implications of this online harassment campaign, and what role does gender play?
- The campaign reflects Russia's broader disinformation strategy, aimed at weakening the EU's international standing and its support for Ukraine. Experts suggest the misogynistic attacks are also a factor, demonstrating a rejection of women in influential political roles within the context of Putin's system characterized by "toxic masculinity."
- How do Russian officials and state media portray Ursula von der Leyen, and what are the underlying reasons for this negative portrayal?
- Russian officials and state media employ derogatory and misogynistic language, focusing on her past medical experience and minimizing her political achievements. This reflects Russia's broader strategy to discredit the EU, undermine its unity, and delegitimize its support for Ukraine.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the attacks on Ursula von der Leyen as a deliberate campaign of hate speech and disinformation originating from Russia. The headline, while not explicitly stated, implies a targeted attack. The article emphasizes the insults and ridicule directed at Von der Leyen, highlighting derogatory statements made by Russian officials like Medvedev and Zakharova. This framing potentially reinforces the narrative of Russia's aggression and its targeting of prominent EU figures.
Language Bias
The article uses strong language such as "insults," "calumnies," "propaganda of hate," "malicious gynecologist," and "toxic masculinity." While accurately reflecting the statements made, this language choices contributes to a negative portrayal of Russia and its actions. More neutral alternatives could include 'criticism', 'negative statements', 'statements against', 'public commentary' and 'gendered remarks' instead of the stronger choices used. The repeated use of "hate campaign" strengthens the negative connotation.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative portrayal of Von der Leyen by Russian officials and media. It might benefit from including counter-narratives or perspectives that could offer a more balanced view. For example, opinions from those who do not see the attacks as a deliberate campaign of hate or who might provide alternative explanations for the criticism. Due to space constraints, this omission might not be intentional bias, but it does affect the overall narrative.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a clear dichotomy between Von der Leyen as a victim of Russian disinformation and Russia as the perpetrator. It doesn't explore the possibility of other contributing factors or interpretations of the events beyond the presented narrative. While the evidence presented supports the framing, acknowledging alternative interpretations could provide a more comprehensive analysis.
Gender Bias
The article highlights the gendered nature of some attacks against Von der Leyen, particularly Medvedev's reference to her as a "malicious gynecologist" and the focus on her past internship at a women's clinic. This points to gender bias in the Russian rhetoric. The article does a good job of connecting this to the broader context of Russia's "toxic masculinity." However, further analysis of whether similar personal attacks are leveled against male political figures could strengthen this section.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a campaign of misogynistic attacks against Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, orchestrated by Russian state media. This directly impacts gender equality by undermining a woman in a powerful political position through sexist and demeaning rhetoric, creating a hostile environment and discouraging women from pursuing leadership roles. The use of her profession (gynecologist) in a derogatory manner is a clear example of gender-based attacks used to discredit her political standing. This perpetuates harmful gender stereotypes and inhibits women's advancement in politics.