lexpress.fr
Russia's WWII Narrative: Justifying the Ukraine War
Russia's May 9th WWII Victory Day parade, attended by global leaders, showcased a national narrative minimizing Allied contributions and maximizing the USSR's role, justifying the Ukraine conflict as a continuation of the 'Great Patriotic War'.
- How does Russia's current narrative of WWII serve to justify its actions in Ukraine?
- On May 9th, Russia commemorated the 80th anniversary of its victory against Nazi Germany with a military parade featuring 30 heads of state, including Xi Jinping and Nicolas Maduro. This event underscores Russia's instrumentalization of WWII history, shaping a national narrative that minimizes Soviet wartime allies and maximizes the USSR's role.
- What role did the German-Soviet pact of 1939 play in shaping Russia's current narrative of WWII?
- The Russian government's narrative portrays the Soviet Union as having single-handedly defeated Nazi Europe, omitting crucial contributions from Allied powers. This historical revisionism, initiated under Stalin, serves to legitimize the current regime's actions and expansionist ambitions, framing the war in Ukraine as a continuation of this 'Great Patriotic War'.
- What are the long-term implications of Russia's historical revisionism regarding WWII for international relations and historical understanding?
- This manipulation of WWII history is not merely a matter of historical revision; it is a strategic tool used by Vladimir Putin to justify his imperialistic goals in Eastern Europe. By equating Ukrainians with Nazis and portraying the West as inherently Nazi, Putin seeks to garner internal support and present the Ukraine conflict as a necessary fight against an existential threat, echoing Stalin's techniques.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently emphasizes Russia's role as the sole victor against fascism, constructing a narrative of heroic self-reliance and national destiny. Headlines and subheadings likely highlight the anniversary celebration and Poutine's military parade, reinforcing this image. The introduction of the article itself focuses on the Russian perspective, thus shaping reader interpretation by prioritizing the Russian narrative and downplaying other perspectives.
Language Bias
The text uses loaded language such as 'sacralisation,' 'nettoyage de la mémoire,' and 'opération de nettoyage' to describe the Russian narrative of World War II. These phrases carry strong negative connotations, suggesting manipulation and distortion. The repeated use of the term "nazis" to describe Ukrainians and, by extension, the West, is also a form of loaded language, implying a moral equivalence that is arguably inaccurate and inflammatory. Neutral alternatives might include describing actions without using such loaded descriptors.
Bias by Omission
The Russian narrative surrounding World War II omits or downplays several crucial aspects. The Soviet Union's initial alliance with Nazi Germany through the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact is largely ignored, as is the significant material support received from the US through the Lend-Lease program. Crimes committed by the Soviet army during and after the war, including the Katyn Forest massacre and widespread rapes, are largely absent from the official narrative. The substantial role played by other Allied forces in the war's outcome is also minimized. These omissions create a skewed understanding of the war and its consequences.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a false dichotomy between Russia as a heroic defender against Nazism and the West as inherently Nazi or complicit with Nazism. This oversimplification ignores the complexities of the war and the diverse motivations and actions of various actors. It also falsely positions the current conflict in Ukraine as a continuation of this struggle, neglecting the nuances of the present geopolitical situation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article details how the Russian government manipulates the narrative of World War II to justify its current actions, including the war in Ukraine. This manipulation undermines international peace and justice by promoting a false narrative that legitimizes aggression and the violation of national sovereignty. The glorification of a distorted historical narrative to justify contemporary actions is a clear obstacle to building strong, peaceful institutions based on truth and international cooperation.