dw.com
Sahel Alliance at Two: Unfulfilled Promises and Growing Insecurity
Two years after its formation, the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), comprising Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, faces criticism for unmet promises in security and economic integration, despite claims of regional cooperation against terrorism.
- What are the most significant security and economic challenges facing the AES after two years?
- The AES has failed to establish a unified military force, leaving the region vulnerable to escalating terrorist attacks. Economically, the alliance has not delivered on its promises of integration, with criticisms focusing on inequitable trade practices and lack of economic progress, particularly impacting Niger.
- How do the member states' perspectives on the AES differ, and what are the specific concerns raised?
- Niger expresses skepticism, citing unequal economic contributions and military support. Mali focuses on the lack of economic progress and renewed calls for currency reform. Burkina Faso emphasizes its ongoing security crisis and the ineffectiveness of the AES in addressing the violence. Critics across all three countries highlight the absence of a functional joint military force.
- What are the potential long-term implications for the AES and the Sahel region if the current challenges remain unresolved?
- Continued failure to address insecurity and economic disparities could deepen instability in the Sahel, potentially leading to further fragmentation and the exacerbation of existing conflicts. The lack of a unified response to terrorism undermines regional security, while economic stagnation fuels discontent and hinders development.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view by highlighting both positive and negative perspectives on the AES. While it mentions the skepticism and criticism from Niger and Mali regarding economic benefits and military imbalances, it also includes counterpoints emphasizing strategic advantages and geopolitical gains. The inclusion of diverse viewpoints prevents a one-sided narrative.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, although some phrasing could be improved. For example, describing Niger as "the fool" in the AES is a direct quote but reflects a biased opinion. Phrases like "increasing insecurity" could be replaced with more neutral terms like "heightened security concerns.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including data on the economic indicators for each country involved in the AES. This would allow for a more thorough evaluation of the economic claims made by various stakeholders. Additionally, details about the structure and composition of the joint military force could enhance the analysis of its effectiveness.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the failure of the AES (Alliance des États du Sahel) to improve security in the Sahel region. Despite its aim to combat terrorism and enhance state sovereignty, terrorist attacks continue to rise, and large parts of Mali and Burkina Faso remain outside government control. The lack of a functional joint military force, as intended by the AES, exacerbates the security challenges. This directly impacts SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) which focuses on promoting peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, providing access to justice for all and building effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. The failure to achieve these goals undermines peace and security in the region.