t24.com.tr
Saturday Mothers Mark 1048th Week Demanding Justice for Kadir Keremoğlu
The Saturday Mothers held their 1048th weekly protest on April 26th, 2025, demanding justice for Kadir Keremoğlu, who disappeared after being detained in Van on April 14th, 1995; the family alleges involvement of JİTEM, and despite witness testimonies and evidence, no accountability has been achieved.
- What evidence links state security forces to the disappearance of Kadir Keremoğlu, and why has this evidence not led to successful prosecution?
- The Saturday Mothers' continued protests underscore the Turkish government's persistent failure to address human rights abuses and enforced disappearances dating back to the 1990s. The case of Kadir Keremoğlu, a wealthy businessman abducted in 1995, exemplifies the alleged involvement of state security forces (JİTEM) and the subsequent lack of effective investigation or prosecution despite witness testimonies and evidence of ransom demands.
- What specific actions by the Turkish government demonstrate a lack of accountability regarding the disappearance of Kadir Keremoğlu and other enforced disappearances?
- On April 26th, 2025, the Saturday Mothers held their 1048th week of protests in Galatasaray Square, Istanbul, demanding justice for Kadir Keremoğlu, who disappeared after being detained 30 years ago. They criticized the government for ignoring court rulings and obstructing their efforts. The protest included a statement read by Jiyan Tosun, highlighting the ongoing lack of accountability for enforced disappearances.
- What are the long-term implications of the Turkish government's continued disregard for human rights and its failure to address historical cases of enforced disappearances?
- The Keremoğlu family's decades-long struggle highlights the systemic impunity surrounding enforced disappearances in Turkey. The government's continued defiance of court orders and suppression of protests suggest a lack of political will to resolve these cases and hold perpetrators accountable. This lack of accountability perpetuates a climate of fear and injustice, hindering reconciliation and the pursuit of truth.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative strongly emphasizes the family's suffering and their persistent struggle for justice. The headline and introductory paragraphs clearly frame the event as a case of injustice and human rights violation. While this is understandable given the context, it might inadvertently shape the reader's perception, potentially overlooking other considerations. The sequencing of events, focusing first on the family's ordeal and then mentioning the alleged involvement of state security forces, might create a pre-conceived notion of guilt in the reader's mind.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral. However, terms such as "JİTEM bağlantılı çete" (JİTEM-linked gang) and descriptions of the alleged actions carry strong negative connotations. While these terms accurately reflect the family's perspective, they could be presented with slightly more measured language. For example, instead of 'gang', perhaps 'group' could be used.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the family's account and the actions of the alleged perpetrators. However, it omits potential counter-arguments or alternative perspectives from the government or law enforcement agencies regarding the accusations against JİTEM and the handling of the case. The lack of official responses or alternative narratives might limit the reader's ability to form a fully balanced understanding of the situation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a clear dichotomy between the family's pursuit of justice and the perceived inaction or obstruction by authorities. While this framing highlights the injustice, it potentially oversimplifies the complexities of the legal and political landscape surrounding such cases. The narrative does not explore the possibility of bureaucratic hurdles or legitimate reasons for delays or the difficulties in pursuing such cases, which might have influenced the outcomes.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the ongoing struggle of the Saturday Mothers in Turkey, who have been seeking justice for their disappeared loved ones for 28 years. The case of Kadir Keremoğlu, disappeared in 1995, exemplifies the state's failure to uphold the rule of law, investigate enforced disappearances, and bring perpetrators to justice. This directly undermines SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.