liberation.fr
Saudi Arabia's 2024 Executions Surpass 300, Defying International Pressure
Saudi Arabia's executions in 2024 exceeded 300, a sharp rise from previous years, placing it among the world's top executioners despite international condemnation and its claims to limit capital punishment to major crimes; over 100 of those executed were foreign nationals.
- What is the significance of Saudi Arabia's drastic increase in executions in 2024, exceeding 300, and its implications for global human rights?
- Saudi Arabia's executions in 2024 have surpassed 300, a significant increase from 172 in 2023 and 196 in 2022. This places the country among the top three global executioners, behind China and Iran. The surge involves various crimes, including drug trafficking and terrorism-related charges, with over 100 foreign nationals executed.
- How does the high number of foreign nationals among those executed, mostly for drug offenses, affect Saudi Arabia's international standing and its relations with international organizations?
- The sharp rise in Saudi executions contradicts claims by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to limit capital punishment to major crimes. This increase occurs despite international pressure and UN appeals to halt executions for drug offenses, highlighting the kingdom's disregard for international human rights norms. The high number of foreign nationals executed further underscores the severity of the situation.
- What are the long-term implications of Saudi Arabia's continued use of capital punishment for its domestic and international image, considering its attempts at social and judicial liberalization?
- Saudi Arabia's increased use of capital punishment, despite its efforts to present a modernized image, indicates a potential tension between domestic security priorities and international relations. This could lead to strained diplomatic relations with countries emphasizing human rights and may impact future foreign investment decisions. The reliance on capital punishment also casts doubt on the kingdom's judicial reform pledges.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the increase in executions in Saudi Arabia negatively, highlighting the criticism from human rights organizations. The headline (not provided but inferred from the text) likely emphasizes the record number of executions. The use of phrases like "sombre bilan," "mépris flagrant," and "engagement non tenu" reinforces this negative framing. While it includes a quote from Saudi Arabia justifying its use of capital punishment, this justification is presented as a weak counterpoint to the overwhelming negative coverage.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as "sombre bilan," "mépris flagrant," "incompréhensibles et inexplicables," and "barbare" which convey strong negative emotions toward Saudi Arabia's actions. These terms are not neutral and shape the reader's perception. More neutral alternatives could include "high number of executions," "strong criticism," "difficult to explain," and "killing."
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the increase in executions in Saudi Arabia but omits detailed information about the legal processes leading to these executions. It mentions "crimes linked to terrorism" and drug trafficking but doesn't elaborate on the specifics of these cases or the fairness of the trials. This lack of context limits the reader's ability to form a fully informed opinion.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a dichotomy between Saudi Arabia's efforts towards liberalization and modernization and its high number of executions. It implies an inherent contradiction without exploring the complexities of the Saudi legal system or the potential justifications offered by the government for maintaining capital punishment. The narrative does not consider the possibility that these goals might not be mutually exclusive.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a significant increase in executions in Saudi Arabia, contradicting claims of limiting the death penalty and raising concerns about human rights violations and the lack of due process. The high number of executions, especially for drug-related offenses, and the execution of foreign nationals, directly undermines the SDG target of promoting peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, providing access to justice for all, and building effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.