sueddeutsche.de
Schleswig-Holstein: Species Extinction and Recovery
In Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, while some species like the otter and sea eagle are recovering thanks to conservation efforts, intensive agriculture has caused a significant decline in insect populations and other species, highlighting the need for sustainable practices.
- What is the current state of biodiversity in Schleswig-Holstein, and what are the most significant factors influencing it?
- While some species, such as the otter and sea eagle, are recovering due to conservation measures, a drastic decline in insect populations has been observed. This is largely attributed to intensive agriculture practices, including year-round indoor cattle farming and the extensive use of insecticides.
- How has intensive agriculture contributed to the decline in biodiversity, and what specific examples illustrate this impact?
- Intensive agriculture, characterized by year-round indoor cattle farming and the use of insecticides, has led to a more than 75% decrease in flying insects since 1989. The Kiebitz bird population has also decreased by over 90% due to the timing of hay-making coinciding with their breeding season.
- What measures are being proposed or implemented to address biodiversity loss in Schleswig-Holstein, and what are the potential long-term implications of these efforts?
- Measures include a cattle grazing subsidy to encourage pastureland and the creation of diverse landscapes with blooming strips and natural hedges. The long-term success depends on incentivizing farmers to adopt sustainable practices and on broader societal changes in consumption patterns to support these efforts. The minister emphasizes that planning with nature, not against it, is essential for recovery.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of biodiversity loss and recovery in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. While highlighting the alarming rate of global species extinction and the impact of intensive agriculture, it also showcases examples of successful conservation efforts, such as the recovery of the otter and sea eagle populations. The inclusion of both positive and negative aspects prevents a solely alarming or overly optimistic narrative.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. Terms like "intensive agriculture" and "highly effective insecticides" accurately describe the practices without overt emotional loading. The use of quotes from the Minister and BUND spokesperson maintains objectivity. However, phrases such as "Totenstille" (dead silence) in the description of spring could be considered slightly emotive, although it reflects the severity of insect decline.
Bias by Omission
While the article provides a comprehensive overview, potential omissions exist. The article could benefit from specifying the exact geographic areas within Schleswig-Holstein where otter and sea eagle populations have recovered. Further details on the economic aspects of conservation measures (e.g., costs and benefits of implementing the measures) would provide a more holistic view. Additionally, mentioning alternative perspectives on the effectiveness of current conservation strategies would enhance the article's balance.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article directly addresses the decline in biodiversity and species extinction, a key concern under SDG 15 (Life on Land). It highlights the negative impacts of intensive agriculture, use of pesticides, and habitat loss on various species, including insects, birds (Kiebitz), and overall ecosystem health. The decrease in insect populations by over 75% and the 90% decline in Kiebitz birds are stark examples of the negative impact on biodiversity. Conversely, the article also showcases successful conservation efforts that led to the recovery of the otter and sea eagle populations, demonstrating that positive action can reverse negative trends. This makes it directly relevant to SDG 15 targets focusing on the protection, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems.