nrc.nl
Serebrennikov's Boris Godunov: A Modern Russian Tragedy
Kirill Serebrennikov's Amsterdam production of Modest Mussorgsky's Boris Godunov, set in modern Russia, uses raw realism and photography to depict the suffering of the Russian people, interweaving dissidents' last words, while the Concertgebouworkest and a stellar cast deliver a powerful performance.
- How does the staging and use of photography contribute to the opera's overall message and emotional impact?
- Serebrennikov's interpretation connects the historical context of Tsarist intrigue to present-day Russia, highlighting the enduring power dynamics between rulers and the ruled. The production uses photography by Dima Markov showcasing the poverty and vulnerability of the Russian people, suggesting a longing for love amid hardship. This contrasts with the opulent setting of the opera house.
- What is the central message conveyed by Serebrennikov's production of Boris Godunov, and how does it connect to the current geopolitical situation?
- Kirill Serebrennikov's Amsterdam production of Modest Mussorgsky's Boris Godunov transposes the 16th-century story to modern Russia, focusing on the suffering of the Russian people rather than Tsar Boris. The staging uses raw realism to depict poverty, corruption, and propaganda, incorporating footage of actual propaganda broadcasts. Dissident's last words are interwoven into the opera.
- Does the production successfully balance artistic expression with political commentary, and what are the potential interpretations of its ambiguous ending?
- The production's focus on the plight of the common Russian, amidst the backdrop of the Ukraine war and the use of propaganda, implies a commentary on the current political climate and its impact on the population. The melancholic ending, featuring a solitary coffin and a prediction of an approaching enemy, leaves the audience with a sense of foreboding regarding Russia's future. The opera's use of imagery raises questions on whether it glorifies or critiques the suffering of the Russian people.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The review frames the opera through the lens of the ongoing war in Ukraine and its impact on the perception of Russian culture. This framing, while understandable given the context, might overshadow other potential interpretations of the production. The emphasis on the director's political commentary and the portrayal of Russian poverty risks overshadowing a discussion of the artistic choices in staging, acting and musical interpretation. The headline question "Is your geweten eating you alive?" immediately sets a moralizing tone.
Language Bias
While largely neutral, the review uses some loaded language. Phrases like "ranzig" (rancid) to describe the estheticization of poverty, and "brutale beeldtaal" (brutal imagery) carry strong negative connotations that could influence reader perception. More neutral alternatives could include 'uncomfortable' or 'stark' for 'ranzig', and 'bold imagery' or 'striking visual language' for 'brutale beeldtaal'.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses heavily on the director's interpretation and the performance aspects, potentially omitting counterpoints or alternative critical perspectives on the opera's staging and message. The political context is emphasized, but a deeper exploration of the opera's artistic merit independent of the political overlay might have offered a more balanced perspective. The review also doesn't delve into the specific choices made in adapting the libretto or the musical interpretations beyond surface-level observations.
False Dichotomy
The review subtly presents a false dichotomy by framing the audience's response as either complete acceptance or rejection of the opera's political message, ignoring the possibility of nuanced interpretations or critical engagement that doesn't fall into these extremes. The dichotomy between art and politics is also somewhat oversimplified.
Sustainable Development Goals
The opera depicts a raw-realistic portrayal of poverty and hunger in Russia, highlighting the stark realities faced by many citizens. The director's staging and the photographer's images underscore the depth of this issue, directly connecting to SDG 1's goal of eradicating poverty in all its forms everywhere.