mk.ru
Seven "Black Swan" Risks Facing the Russian Economy in 2025
A Russian expert identifies seven potential "black swan" events for the country's economy in 2025, including US tariffs on Chinese goods, a new pandemic, asset seizures by the West, a sharp interest rate hike, escalation of the Ukraine conflict, new EU sanctions, and instability in Belarus.
- What secondary risks could significantly impact the Russian economy in 2025, and what are their potential consequences?
- The most significant potential economic "black swan" event for Russia in 2025 is the imposition of US tariffs on Chinese goods, which would negatively impact oil prices and severely affect the Moscow Exchange index (60% exporters). This would also harm the budget and the ruble.
- What is the most significant potential "black swan" event for the Russian economy in 2025, and what are its immediate consequences?
- The Syrian conflict, while impactful in 2024, is not considered a major unpredictable risk for the Russian economy in 2025. The expert dismisses concerns about a Qatari gas pipeline to Europe as a significant threat, citing the higher cost-effectiveness and market flexibility of LNG transport.
- What are the long-term geopolitical risks that could significantly impact the Russian economy and its relationship with the West in 2025 and beyond?
- Other major risks include a new COVID-19-like pandemic, potentially exacerbated by Russia's frozen foreign reserves, leading to reduced budget revenue and increased healthcare costs. The potential Western transfer of frozen Russian assets to Ukraine could trigger retaliatory actions, severely damaging investment and trade ties for decades.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently emphasizes the negative potential of various events, creating a pessimistic outlook. The headline (if there were one) would likely reflect this negativity. The concluding paragraph, while optimistic, feels tacked on and doesn't adequately balance the preceding negativity.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although the repeated use of "black swan" and the focus on negative economic impacts might subtly influence reader perception toward pessimism. The use of phrases like "very painful" is emotive and could be replaced with more neutral descriptions of the economic consequences.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on economic and geopolitical risks, neglecting potential social or environmental "black swans." For example, there is no mention of the impact of climate change or significant social unrest within Russia.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a series of "black swan" events as potential catastrophic risks, creating a sense of impending doom without acknowledging the possibility of mitigating factors or positive outcomes. The constant emphasis on negative scenarios presents a false dichotomy between certain disaster and unwavering optimism in the final paragraph.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses several economic risks that could exacerbate inequality in Russia, such as a potential recession caused by high interest rates, decreased oil prices impacting government revenue and potentially social programs, and sanctions impacting the population differently.