nos.nl
Shell and Climate Change: A Legal Battle
Shell faces legal challenges over its climate impact, with a court ruling impacting future strategies. Environmental groups express concerns about Shell's contribution to climate change and human rights issues.
Dutch
Netherlands
Climate ChangeEuropean UnionEnergy SecurityEnvironmentEnergyLawClimateLegal Dispute
ShellExxon MobilMilieudefensie
Frans EvertsDonald TrumpDarren WoodsDonald Pols
- What is Shell's stance on the Paris Agreement?
- Shell, a major oil company, urged the United States to remain committed to the Paris Agreement on climate change. They believe stable government policies are crucial for effective climate action.
- What was the outcome of the lawsuit against Shell?
- A Dutch court ruled in favor of Shell in a lawsuit brought by environmental groups. While acknowledging Shell's responsibility in climate change, the court deemed it impractical to impose specific emission reduction targets on Shell beyond its own operations.
- How did environmental groups respond to the court ruling?
- Environmental groups argue that Shell's current emissions contribute to human rights violations. They believe that the court's ruling should make Shell reconsider its climate strategy.
- What is the role of the Paris Agreement in this legal dispute?
- The Paris Agreement is central to this case, with environmental groups using it as a legal basis to challenge Shell's environmental impact. Shell and other energy companies face increasing pressure to align their business practices with global climate goals.
- What are Shell's plans regarding future investments in fossil fuels?
- The ruling stated that investments in new oil and gas fields could contradict climate goals. However, Shell plans to maintain its oil production at current levels, with only a fraction of investment directed toward renewable energy sources.