dutchnews.nl
Shell Wins Climate Change Appeal
An appeals court in The Hague overturned a landmark climate change decision against Shell, arguing that forcing the company to reduce emissions wouldn't solve the global problem. Environmental groups vowed to continue the fight.
English
Netherlands
Climate ChangeEnergy SecurityEnvironmentLawsuitEnergyClimateCourt
ShellMilieudefensieGreenpeace
Carla JoustraRonald PolsWael Sawan
- What broader implications does this case have?
- The case highlights the ongoing legal battles surrounding corporate responsibility for climate change and the complexities of assigning individual responsibility for global environmental issues. Similar legal actions against industries and governments are expected to continue.
- What was Shell's response to the court ruling?
- Shell expressed satisfaction with the court's decision, emphasizing its commitment to becoming a net-zero emissions energy business by 2050. The company highlighted its ongoing efforts to halve emissions from its operations by 2030.
- How did Milieudefensie react to the appeals court's decision?
- Milieudefensie, the environmental group that brought the case, expressed disappointment but vowed to continue fighting for corporate responsibility in climate change mitigation. They plan to study the ruling before deciding on next steps.
- What was the basis of the lower court's 2021 decision against Shell?
- The original 2021 ruling by a lower court deemed Shell's carbon emissions a 'very serious threat' to Dutch residents and imposed an 'individual responsibility' on the company for reduction. This decision was appealed by Shell and overturned.
- What was the outcome of the appeals court case against Shell in The Hague?
- The Hague appeals court overturned a lower court ruling that would have forced Shell to drastically cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 45% by 2030. The appeals court argued that while emissions reduction is positive, forcing Shell to reduce emissions wouldn't necessarily mitigate the global climate problem.