lemonde.fr
Shin Bet Admits Failure in Preventing October 7th Hamas Attack
The Shin Bet admitted failure in preventing the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack in Israel, citing intelligence shortcomings and insufficient operational response; the attack resulted in 1218 Israeli deaths and a subsequent conflict causing at least 48,405 Palestinian deaths.
- What specific intelligence failures and operational shortcomings within the Shin Bet directly led to the inability to prevent the October 7th Hamas attack?
- The Shin Bet, Israel's internal security agency, admitted failure in preventing the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack, citing shortcomings in recognizing the immediate threat and insufficient operational response. An internal investigation revealed that different actions could have prevented the massacre, resulting in the deaths of 1218 Israelis, according to the AFP.
- How did Israeli policies contribute to the build-up of Hamas's military capabilities, and what role did external factors, such as Qatari funding, play in this process?
- The investigation points to two key failures: an inability to assess the "Jericho Wall" plan as an immediate threat, despite awareness of Hamas's capabilities, and an underestimation of the Hamas arsenal built with Qatari funding and enabled by Israeli moderation policies. The resulting insufficient warnings and operational response allowed the large-scale attack to proceed.
- What are the long-term implications of this intelligence failure for Israel's national security strategy and its approach to counter-terrorism in the context of ongoing regional conflicts?
- This failure highlights systemic vulnerabilities in Israeli intelligence and security. The reliance on assessments prioritizing incitement over direct attack planning and an underestimation of the effectiveness of Hamas's arsenal, built despite Israeli awareness, reveals critical shortcomings. These failures may necessitate significant reforms within the Shin Bet and a reassessment of Israeli counter-terrorism strategies.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative around the failures of Israeli intelligence and security forces. The headline and opening paragraphs immediately highlight the Shin Bet's admission of failure, setting the tone for the rest of the piece. This framing might lead readers to focus more on the shortcomings of the Israeli response rather than a broader analysis of the attack's causes and consequences. The article's organization, starting with the Shin Bet's self-criticism, reinforces this emphasis.
Language Bias
The article uses relatively neutral language. While words like "massacre" and "fiasco" carry negative connotations, they are used factually to describe events and assessments. There is a tendency to describe the Hamas action in a somewhat neutral way rather than resorting to inflammatory language, however some readers might find the reporting too objective given the context.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the Shin Bet's failures and the Israeli military's failures, but offers limited details on the Hamas planning and execution of the attack. While the article mentions Hamas's "Mur de Jéricho" plan, it lacks specifics about the plan's scope, resources, and timeline. This omission limits the reader's understanding of the full context of the attack. The article also doesn't deeply explore the role of other intelligence agencies or potential external support for Hamas.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified narrative of failure versus success, focusing primarily on the failures of Israeli intelligence and military response. It does not fully explore the complexities of asymmetric warfare, the challenges of predicting and preventing large-scale attacks, or the potential for unforeseen circumstances to influence events. The emphasis on 'failure' lacks the nuance of acknowledging the scale of the attack and the difficulties in anticipating such events.
Sustainable Development Goals
The Shin Bet's failure to prevent the Hamas attack highlights a significant weakness in Israel's security institutions, undermining peace and stability and failing to uphold the rule of law. The resulting loss of life and the subsequent conflict further exacerbate instability and hinder progress towards peaceful resolution.