lemonde.fr
Silence in Hollywood: A Shift in Celebrity Political Engagement Under Trump
Since Donald Trump's 2024 policy shift, many prominent American artists and actors, previously vocal critics, have become unusually silent, contrasting sharply with their 2017 responses; this silence might reflect fear, powerlessness, or strategic calculation, marked by a noticeable absence of commentary from figures like Beyoncé and Taylor Swift, while Trump appointed conservative actors as Hollywood ambassadors.
- How does the current stance of American celebrities reflect broader political and social shifts in the United States?
- The shift from vocal opposition to silence among American celebrities reflects a complex interplay of factors, including fear of reprisal, a sense of powerlessness, and perhaps calculated self-preservation. The noticeable absence of commentary from figures like Beyoncé and Taylor Swift underscores this change.
- What accounts for the stark contrast between the outspoken criticism of Donald Trump by American celebrities in 2017 and their largely muted response to his current policies?
- Following four months of Donald Trump's controversial policies, many prominent American artists, musicians, and actors have remained unusually silent, despite past outspoken criticism. This contrasts sharply with their reactions to Trump's first victory in 2017, when numerous celebrities openly condemned him.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of this shift in celebrity political engagement, and what does it suggest about the future of political discourse in the United States?
- The current silence from Hollywood contrasts with the vehement criticism following Trump's first election. This suggests a potential shift in the relationship between celebrities and political engagement, perhaps indicating a strategic retreat or a deeper sense of disillusionment with the effectiveness of their past actions. The appointment of conservative actors as Hollywood ambassadors further exemplifies this changing dynamic.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the silence of American artists as a significant event, emphasizing their past outspokenness to highlight their current inaction. The headline (if one existed) would likely reinforce this framing. The choice to begin with the question, "Et ils sont où les artistes américains..." immediately establishes a sense of absence and implied criticism.
Language Bias
The article uses charged language, such as "brutalité" (brutality), "contre-réforme" (counter-reform), and words implying capitulation and docility, shaping the reader's perception of the artists' response. Phrases such as "gâchette faciles" (easy trigger) and comparing Trump's actions to being "cent fois pire" (a hundred times worse) are emotive and hyperbolic. More neutral language could provide a less biased account.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the silence of American artists in response to Trump's policies, but omits counter-arguments or perspectives from those who may support Trump or remain neutral. It doesn't explore the potential reasons for their silence beyond speculation about fear, shock, or self-interest. The lack of diverse opinions presents an incomplete picture.
False Dichotomy
The article sets up a false dichotomy between outspoken criticism during periods of perceived calm and the current silence of American artists. It simplifies the complex motivations behind artists' choices, overlooking other factors such as strategic engagement, individual political stances, or simply a change in priorities.
Gender Bias
While the article mentions several female artists (Julia Roberts, Beyoncé, Taylor Swift, Billie Eilish), the analysis focuses more on the overall silence of artists regardless of gender. There's no explicit gender bias in the language or examples used, but a more in-depth look at gendered responses to Trump's policies might provide a fuller picture.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the silence of American artists and celebrities in the face of Donald Trump's policies, suggesting a lack of engagement in holding power accountable and a potential erosion of democratic values. This inaction contrasts sharply with their outspoken criticism during Trump's first term, indicating a shift towards self-censorship or fear of reprisal, which undermines the principles of freedom of expression and active citizenship crucial for strong institutions and a just society.