corriere.it
Sixth Mass Extinction: Scientific Predictions Confirmed
Edward O. Wilson and Richard Leakey predicted a sixth mass extinction caused by human activities like deforestation, pollution, and overexploitation of resources; scientific data now supports their claim, highlighting the loss of over 350 vertebrate species since 1500 and a 30% decline in many surviving populations.
- What specific evidence confirms the occurrence of the predicted sixth mass extinction and its primary causes?
- Edward O. Wilson and Richard Leakey, in the 1980s and 1990s, predicted a "sixth mass extinction" due to human destruction of ecosystems. Their warnings, initially dismissed, are now supported by official scientific documentation showing a significant loss of biodiversity.
- How do the economic, ecological, and ethical arguments presented by Wilson and Leakey support the need for biodiversity conservation?
- The predicted sixth mass extinction is attributed to five converging factors: habitat loss, invasive species, chemical pollution, overpopulation, and overexploitation of resources. These, amplified by climate change, are causing extinctions comparable to past mass extinctions.
- What systemic changes are necessary to mitigate the sixth mass extinction, and what are the potential long-term consequences of inaction?
- The extinction of species impacts essential ecosystem services like pollination, soil fertility, and water quality, threatening human food security and overall well-being. Protecting and restoring 30-50% of ecosystems could halt the mass extinction, according to Wilson and Leakey's models.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the scientific consensus and the severity of the sixth mass extinction, based on the work of Wilson and Leakey. The narrative strongly supports their warnings, presenting evidence of biodiversity loss and the human role in it. The headline, if there were one, would likely reflect this emphasis.
Language Bias
While the article uses strong language to describe the situation (e.g., "catastrophe," "cocktail mortale," "tempesta perfetta"), this is justified given the gravity of the subject matter. The language is largely objective and supported by scientific evidence.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the warnings of Wilson and Leakey, and the evidence supporting their claims. While it mentions solutions, it doesn't delve into the political or economic complexities hindering their implementation. This omission, however, may be due to space constraints and the article's focus on the scientific evidence of the sixth mass extinction.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article details the ongoing sixth mass extinction, primarily driven by human activities like deforestation, habitat fragmentation, invasive species, pollution, overpopulation, and overexploitation of resources. These directly impact biodiversity and ecosystem health, core components of SDG 15 (Life on Land). The text highlights the significant loss of terrestrial vertebrate species and the decline in populations of various organisms, including insects crucial for pollination and ecosystem services. This aligns directly with SDG 15 targets focused on protecting, restoring, and promoting sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems.