
dw.com
Skopje Air Pollution from Drisla Landfill Fire
A fire at the Drisla landfill in Skopje, North Macedonia, continues to cause significant air pollution, with PM2.5 levels reaching 7.9 times the WHO recommended limit in some areas, prompting accusations of government negligence and suspicions of arson.
- What is the immediate impact of the ongoing Drisla landfill fire on Skopje's air quality?
- The fire has resulted in dangerously high levels of PM2.5 and PM10 particulates in Skopje. In Lisice, PM2.5 levels were 7.9 times higher than the WHO annual recommendation. This is causing significant health concerns for residents and contributing to a smoky, hazy atmosphere.
- What are the accusations and responses surrounding the cause and handling of the Drisla landfill fire?
- The opposition party, SDSM, blames the government for the ongoing pollution, citing negligence in extinguishing the fire. Prime Minister Hristijan Mickoski suggests the fire may be politically motivated, pointing to unusual occurrences in public companies with DUI personnel. Investigations are underway by the prosecutor's office and police.
- What are the longer-term implications and potential solutions to address the recurring fires and air pollution issues in Skopje?
- The recurring nature of the fires raises concerns about the long-term management of the Drisla landfill. The government's response emphasizes immediate fire suppression and investigation into potential arson. Longer-term solutions may require improved waste management practices and stronger regulatory enforcement to prevent future incidents.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a somewhat balanced view, including statements from the opposition (SDSM) criticizing the government's response and the government's (Prime Minister Mickoski) counterarguments and explanations. However, the inclusion of Mickoski's suspicion about DUI's involvement in the fires, while presenting it as a possibility, might subtly frame the issue as politically motivated, without definitive proof. The headline itself, while not explicitly biased, focuses on the ongoing issue and implicitly suggests ongoing governmental failure.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, but certain word choices could subtly influence perception. For example, describing the air as smelling of "burnt plastic" is evocative and negative, while phrases like "the government is to blame" (from the opposition) and Mickoski's suggestions about DUI involvement are loaded and accusatory. Neutral alternatives could include describing the smell as "a strong odor" and focusing on factual information regarding the air quality rather than accusatory language.
Bias by Omission
While the article presents multiple perspectives, it could benefit from including data on air quality from sources besides "I-Q-Air." Additionally, details about the specific measures taken by the government to address the fires (beyond general statements) would enhance transparency. More information about the investigation underway could also improve the reader's understanding of the situation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a significant air pollution event caused by a fire at the Drisla landfill in Skopje, North Macedonia. High concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 particulate matter were recorded, exceeding WHO recommended levels. This directly impacts human health, causing respiratory problems and other health issues. The ongoing issue, despite government efforts, indicates a failure to protect public health.