repubblica.it
Smart TV's Streaming Revolution: YouTube's Dominance and the Future of Television
Despite declining traditional TV viewership in Italy and the US, smart TVs' integration of streaming platforms like YouTube (leading at nearly 10% of viewing time), Netflix, and Prime Video has increased TV's centrality, highlighting a business model shift rather than a viewing habit change.
- How are social media platforms adapting to the television viewing model, and what are the implications for content creation and distribution?
- Despite the rise of smartphones and social media, traditional television's transformation into smart TV has secured its relevance. Streaming platforms' dominance on smart TVs highlights a shift in business models rather than viewing habits, with YouTube leading in smart TV usage at nearly 10% of total viewing time.
- What is the impact of streaming services on traditional television viewership, and how has this affected the overall role of television in media consumption?
- In 2025, traditional Italian TV viewership in prime time dropped below 20 million, while US cable TV subscriptions halved since 2013, reaching 57 million. However, smart TV's integration of streaming platforms like YouTube, Netflix, and Prime Video has increased TV's centrality, with streaming accounting for 38.5% of total viewing time.
- What are the long-term implications of the convergence of television and social media platforms for content creators, viewers, and the overall media landscape?
- The integration of streaming platforms into smart TVs signifies a convergence of social media and television. Social media platforms are adapting to longer, horizontal video formats, mirroring television's structure, suggesting a future where the lines between social media and television blur further, with content creators transitioning to television platforms.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative around the continued dominance of television, even in the age of smartphones and social media. The headline and introduction emphasize television's enduring power. While the article acknowledges the decline of traditional linear television, this decline is presented as less significant than the shift towards smart TV and streaming platforms, effectively downplaying the impact of mobile technologies. The positive framing of YouTube's success on smart TVs further reinforces the focus on television's continued importance.
Language Bias
The article uses relatively neutral language. However, phrases like "the queen of our living room" and "inglobare i social stessi" (engulfing the social networks themselves) might be considered slightly loaded, suggesting a degree of anthropomorphism and implicit bias towards traditional television. More neutral phrasing might be: "the central device in many households" and "integrate social media platforms.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the shift towards smart TVs and streaming platforms, potentially neglecting other forms of media consumption and technological advancements that may be impacting television's dominance. It also lacks specific data on the economic aspects of television's transformation, such as the profitability of streaming services on smart TVs versus traditional cable. While the limitations of space are acknowledged, a more comprehensive view of the media landscape could have enriched the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between traditional television and streaming services. It suggests that the rise of streaming is a transformation of business models rather than a fundamental shift in media consumption. However, it ignores the potential for completely new forms of media consumption that are not directly related to traditional television formats.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights how YouTube, a platform with user-generated content, has found significant success on Smart TVs, potentially democratizing content creation and distribution and reducing the barriers to entry for creators, regardless of their background or resources. This increased accessibility could lead to more diverse voices and perspectives being shared, reducing inequalities in media representation.