dailymail.co.uk
Soaring Cocoa Prices Drive Investment in Lab-Grown Alternatives
Soaring cocoa prices, exceeding \$12,000 per tonne in April 2024 due to climate change and disease in West Africa, are pushing chocolate makers like Mondelez to invest in lab-grown alternatives, such as Celleste Bio's cell-cultured cocoa, to ensure sustainable supply and stable pricing.
- What are the primary causes of the recent surge in cocoa prices, and what immediate impact is this having on the chocolate industry?
- The soaring price of cocoa, exceeding \$12,000 per tonne in April 2024 (three times January's price), is driving chocolate makers to explore lab-grown alternatives. Mondelez International's investment in Celleste Bio, a company producing cocoa from cell cultures, exemplifies this shift, aiming to reduce reliance on rainforest-sourced cocoa. This price surge is due to poor climate and disease in West Africa, impacting 70 percent of global production.
- How are major chocolate companies responding to the rising cost and potential scarcity of cocoa, and what alternative solutions are being explored?
- Climate change and disease in West Africa have caused a drastic increase in cocoa prices, threatening chocolate production. Companies like Mondelez are investing in lab-grown cocoa alternatives to ensure sustainable supply and maintain consistent quality and price. This reflects a broader trend in the food industry of seeking alternative production methods due to environmental and economic pressures.
- What are the potential long-term implications of lab-grown cocoa for the chocolate industry, considering both economic and environmental factors, and what challenges remain to be overcome?
- Celleste Bio aims for cost parity with pre-2024 cocoa prices by 2027, a crucial step for market viability. Consumer acceptance of taste and texture remains a challenge for lab-grown cocoa. The long-term impact will depend on successful scaling of production and consumer adoption, potentially reshaping the chocolate industry's supply chain and reducing its environmental footprint.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes the urgency of finding alternatives to traditional cocoa due to rising prices and sustainability concerns. This is evident in the prominent placement of quotes from executives of companies developing lab-grown cocoa and the repeated emphasis on the high cost and potential scarcity of cocoa. While the challenges of traditional cocoa production are presented, the narrative subtly steers the reader towards viewing lab-grown alternatives as a more desirable and necessary solution. The headline (if one were to be created) would likely emphasize the lab-grown alternatives.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, using descriptive words like "soaring," "dizzying," and "record" to describe cocoa prices. While these words convey the magnitude of the price increases, they do not appear overly sensationalized or biased. However, phrases like 'eliminate the industry's costly reliance on fragile rainforests' and 'won't need to be dependent on nature' present lab-grown cocoa in a more positive light than other approaches. More neutral alternatives could include descriptions focusing on the economic and environmental benefits rather than framing traditional cocoa production as solely 'costly' and 'dependent on nature'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the perspectives of companies exploring lab-grown cocoa alternatives and their concerns about cocoa price volatility and sustainability. It mentions consumer preferences and the challenges of lab-grown alternatives, but does not extensively explore the perspectives of cocoa farmers in West Africa, whose livelihoods are directly impacted by price fluctuations and climate change. The potential social and economic consequences of shifting away from traditional cocoa farming are not thoroughly addressed. While acknowledging the limitations of space, a more balanced perspective would include voices from cocoa-producing regions.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between traditional cocoa farming and lab-grown alternatives. While it acknowledges challenges in both approaches, it leans towards portraying lab-grown cocoa as a solution to the problems of traditional cocoa farming without fully exploring the complexities and potential downsides of lab-grown solutions, such as their environmental impact or potential economic effects on cocoa farmers. A more nuanced perspective would explore a range of potential solutions, not just a binary choice.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the development and investment in lab-grown cocoa alternatives as a response to the soaring price of cocoa and its unsustainable sourcing from rainforests. This aligns with SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) by promoting sustainable consumption and production patterns, reducing waste, and improving resource efficiency. The shift towards lab-grown cocoa aims to decrease the industry's reliance on environmentally damaging practices and ensure a more sustainable supply chain.