taz.de
Social Media Resignation: Hindering Global Problem Solving
A growing sense of resignation is spreading on social media, fueled by negative news and the attention economy, hindering efforts to address global challenges; the author suggests "strategic optimism" and "digital impulse control" as countermeasures.
- How does the attention economy of social media platforms contribute to the spread of resignation?
- The article connects the spread of resignation on social media to a decline in collective action towards positive change. It argues that public expressions of hopelessness discourage engagement and reduce the likelihood of averting potential catastrophes. This pattern highlights the significant influence of online discourse on real-world outcomes.
- What are the consequences of the increasing resignation expressed on social media regarding global challenges?
- A growing sense of resignation is spreading through social media, fueled by constant negative news and the attention-grabbing nature of frustrated posts." This is impacting efforts to improve situations, as people lose hope and stop contributing to solutions. The result is a self-fulfilling prophecy where widespread resignation increases the likelihood of negative outcomes.
- What strategies can individuals and society employ to counter the negative impact of public resignation on collective efforts to address global challenges?
- The author proposes "strategic optimism" and "digital impulse control" as countermeasures. Strategic optimism involves maintaining hope despite challenges, while digital impulse control encourages mindful posting to avoid contributing to the cycle of negativity. This approach emphasizes individual agency in combating the spread of resignation and fostering collective action.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative around the dangers of public resignation, emphasizing its contagious nature and potential to become a self-fulfilling prophecy. This framing prioritizes the negative impact of negativity, potentially overlooking the value of expressing frustration and mobilizing collective action through shared experiences.
Language Bias
The article uses strong and emotive language such as "erdrückend" (overwhelming), "Abgrund der Verzweiflung" (abyss of despair), and "Untergang" (downfall) to describe the current situation. While these terms are effective rhetorically, they could be considered loaded language. More neutral alternatives might include 'challenging', 'difficult times', and 'significant problems'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative aspects of the current global situation, potentially omitting positive developments or instances of progress that could offer a more balanced perspective. While acknowledging the severity of challenges, a more comprehensive view might include examples of resilience, successful mitigation efforts, or positive societal changes.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between resignation and unwavering optimism. While acknowledging the validity of feeling overwhelmed, it frames hope as the only viable alternative to despair, overlooking the possibility of nuanced emotional responses and productive engagement with challenges without constant, unrealistic optimism.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article emphasizes the importance of combating resignation and promoting collective action to address climate change and other global challenges. It argues that public expressions of hopelessness can hinder efforts to mitigate climate change, while strategic optimism and collective action can foster positive change. The focus on combating fatalism and promoting active engagement directly contributes to efforts to mitigate climate change and achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement.