dailymail.co.uk
Soldier's Suicide Highlights Military Mental Health Failures
Lance Corporal Charlie Owen, 25, a Welsh Guards soldier, died by suicide after being ordered to leave his family and return to barracks despite expressing suicidal thoughts and a desire to leave the army, prompting an inquest revealing communication failures and inadequate risk assessment within the unit.
- What circumstances led to the death of Lance Corporal Charlie Owen?
- Lance Corporal Charlie Owen, 25, a Welsh Guards soldier with two tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, died by suicide after being ordered to return to barracks, away from his family. The coroner's report suggests this decision, coupled with inadequate risk assessment, may have contributed to his death. His family has been devastated by the loss.
- What role did communication failures within the Welsh Guards play in Owen's death?
- Owen's mental health deteriorated following relationship breakdown and the loss of friends and colleagues. He expressed a desire to leave the army and was assessed as no longer suitable for service, but was subsequently recalled. This decision, made without sufficient understanding of his circumstances, heightened his distress.
- What systemic changes are needed to prevent similar tragedies within the military?
- The inquest revealed communication failures within the Welsh Guards, highlighting a lack of understanding in managing risks related to soldiers' mental health. This case underscores the need for improved risk assessment and communication protocols within the military to protect soldiers' wellbeing.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative around the tragic loss of Lance Corporal Owen and the failures of the army. The headline and early paragraphs emphasize the soldier's death and the subsequent inquest's findings that suggest the army's actions may have contributed to his suicide. This framing naturally evokes sympathy for Owen and criticism of the army's handling of his situation. While the army's response is included, it is presented after the emotionally charged statements from Owen's mother and legal representative.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, although words like 'devastating,' 'demoralised,' and 'tragic' carry emotional weight and contribute to the overall tone of sympathy and sorrow. These words, while not inaccurate, contribute to a narrative that emphasizes the negative aspects of the situation. Alternatives might include 'extremely upsetting,' 'discouraged,' and 'unfortunate,' although they lack the same emotional impact.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the mother's grief and the coroner's findings, but lacks detailed information about the army's risk assessment procedures and communication protocols. While the article mentions failures in communication and risk assessment, it doesn't delve into the specifics of these failures, leaving the reader with a limited understanding of the systemic issues within the army.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't present a false dichotomy, but it could benefit from exploring the complexities of military life and mental health support systems, rather than simply portraying a conflict between the army and Owen's needs.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the tragic suicide of a soldier, Charlie Owen, who suffered from mental health issues exacerbated by his return to barracks away from his family. This directly relates to SDG 3, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. The failure to adequately assess and manage his mental health risks, ultimately contributing to his death, represents a significant setback to achieving this goal. The case underscores the need for improved mental health support and risk management within the military.