elmundo.es
Spain Extends Pandemic Accounting Moratorium for Two Years
Spain extended its pandemic-era accounting moratorium for two years, allowing companies to exclude 2020-2021 losses from solvency calculations until 2026, benefiting tourism businesses and state-rescued firms, and those affected by October's severe weather. This measure helps businesses that were rescued during the pandemic to recover.
- How does this moratorium affect state-aided companies and businesses impacted by recent natural disasters?
- This moratorium extension primarily benefits tourism companies and state-rescued firms like Volotea and Air Nostrum, which are negotiating debt repayments. Air Europa invested €81 million to offset potential insolvency. The measure aims to support businesses with growth potential needing more time to recover.
- What are the immediate economic implications of Spain's two-year extension of the pandemic-era accounting moratorium?
- The Spanish government extended a pandemic-era accounting moratorium for two years, allowing companies to disregard 2020-2021 losses when calculating solvency until 2026. This affects firms struggling to recover, including those aided by state-owned Sepi and Cofides, and businesses impacted by October's severe weather events.
- What are the long-term economic consequences and potential limitations of extending accounting moratoriums in the face of persistent economic challenges?
- While initially intended as temporary pandemic relief, the extension reveals ongoing economic fragility among certain sectors. The inclusion of businesses affected by recent severe weather highlights the need for flexible financial policies to address unforeseen economic shocks. The case of Duro Felguera, entering pre-bankruptcy despite state aid, underscores the limitations of such measures.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline "Sorpresa en el decreto escoba de Nochebuena" (Surprise in the Christmas Eve decree) immediately sets a tone of unexpectedness and potential benefit. The article emphasizes the positive aspects of the moratorium extension, highlighting the relief it provides to businesses and the government. The inclusion of quotes supporting the measure reinforces this positive framing. The potential negative consequences are downplayed or omitted.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, but the headline and the overall tone of the article lean towards portraying the moratorium extension positively. Phrases such as "medida que beneficia principalmente" (measure that mainly benefits) implicitly suggest that the benefits outweigh any potential negative consequences. More neutral language could be used to present a more balanced perspective.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the benefits of the extended moratorium for businesses and the government, without explicitly mentioning potential drawbacks or criticisms of the measure. It also omits discussion of the overall economic impact, both positive and negative, beyond statements about it being "good for the economy." While acknowledging that companies need time to recover, it doesn't present counterarguments or data to support or challenge this claim.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view by focusing on the positive aspects of the moratorium extension without delving into potential downsides or alternative solutions. While it mentions some companies facing difficulties, it doesn't explore other ways those companies might address their financial challenges.
Sustainable Development Goals
The extension of the accounting moratorium allows companies to compensate for losses from 2020 and 2021, aiding their recovery and preventing potential job losses. This is particularly relevant for tourism businesses and those rescued by the state, such as Air Nostrum and Volotea, contributing to economic stability and growth. The measure also helps companies affected by the Dana storm, further supporting economic recovery in affected regions.