Spain's Post-Blackout Energy Shift: 76% Gas Increase, Renewable Curtailment

Spain's Post-Blackout Energy Shift: 76% Gas Increase, Renewable Curtailment

elmundo.es

Spain's Post-Blackout Energy Shift: 76% Gas Increase, Renewable Curtailment

Following a major blackout in Spain, Red Eléctrica implemented emergency measures that increased gas-based electricity generation by 76% in May 2025 compared to May 2024, reaching almost 2,700 GWh, while simultaneously curtailing renewable energy and incurring €405 million in adjustment service costs; however, the final electricity price remained low due to other factors.

Spanish
Spain
EconomySpainEnergy SecurityRenewable EnergyEnergy CrisisBlackoutElectricity Prices
Red EléctricaGrupo Ase
Juan Antonio Martínez
What was the immediate impact of the blackout on Spain's energy mix and the cost of electricity generation?
Following a recent blackout, Spain increased its gas-based electricity generation by 76% in May 2025 compared to May 2024, reaching almost 2,700 GWh. This surge is directly attributed to Red Eléctrica's intervention, prioritizing gas and limiting renewable energy to enhance grid stability. The resulting increase in the cost of adjustment services reached €405 million.
How did Red Eléctrica's intervention using adjustment services affect renewable energy production in May 2025?
Red Eléctrica's actions, while stabilizing the grid, significantly altered Spain's energy mix. The sharp rise in gas usage and the curtailment of renewable energy sources, particularly solar (down 3% from May 2024 despite a 20% increase in installed capacity), showcase a trade-off between grid security and renewable energy integration. This resulted in 2.1% of total monthly green generation being lost, approximately 268 GWh.
What are the potential long-term consequences of Red Eléctrica's post-blackout strategy for Spain's energy independence and electricity prices?
The increased reliance on gas, despite a record low daily electricity price in May 2025, points towards a potential long-term shift in Spain's energy strategy. The high cost of adjustment services (€405 million in May 2025 versus €168 million in May 2024), while currently offset by cheaper solar energy and record hydroelectric generation, raises concerns about future electricity costs if this pattern persists. The impact of limited interconnection with France and Portugal also played a significant role in this situation.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the situation as a necessary but costly trade-off, emphasizing the high cost of the adjustment services and the record gas generation. While acknowledging the low electricity price for consumers, it places significant emphasis on the negative consequences for renewable energy sources. The headline (if any) would likely heavily influence this framing, potentially highlighting the increased cost or the negative impact on renewables.

2/5

Language Bias

The article uses some loaded language, such as describing the increased gas generation as a 'massive' intervention and referring to the renewable energy lost as 'disparado a niveles nunca vistos' (shot up to unprecedented levels), which may carry negative connotations. More neutral alternatives would be 'substantial' increase and 'reached unprecedented levels'. The repeated references to high costs could also be perceived as biased. The description of the low electricity price as "paradoxically" low suggests a bias toward negative framing.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the increased gas generation and restrictions on renewables following the blackout, but omits discussion of potential long-term consequences or alternative solutions to prevent future blackouts. It also doesn't explore the perspectives of other stakeholders, such as renewable energy companies affected by the restrictions or those involved in the investigation of the initial blackout. While acknowledging the low electricity price in May, the piece doesn't delve into the potential impacts on energy security or the long-term implications of relying more heavily on gas.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by implying that the choice is between increased gas generation and renewable energy. It overlooks the possibility of improving grid infrastructure, optimizing energy storage, or implementing better demand-side management strategies to balance the system without such drastic reliance on gas.

Sustainable Development Goals

Affordable and Clean Energy Negative
Direct Relevance

The article highlights a significant increase in gas-based electricity generation (76%) and record restrictions on renewable energy sources following a blackout. This shift, driven by Red Eléctrica's measures to stabilize the system, resulted in a much more expensive energy system. While the consumer impact was limited in May, the long-term implications for energy affordability and reliance on fossil fuels are concerning.