dw.com
Srebrenica Survivor's Testimony: A Six-Day Escape from Genocide
Hasan Hasanovic, a 19-year-old Bosnian Muslim, survived the six-day "death march" from Srebrenica in July 1995, witnessing widespread killings and losing his father and brother, ultimately reaching safety and dedicating his life to preserving the memory of the genocide.
- What were the immediate consequences for Bosnian Muslim men and boys following the fall of Srebrenica to Bosnian Serb forces?
- In July 1995, following the fall of Srebrenica, 19-year-old Hasan Hasanovic embarked on a six-day trek through hostile territory, witnessing killings and narrowly escaping death. He lost his father and brother during the escape and eventually reached safety with hundreds of others.
- How did Hasan Hasanovic's personal experience during the "death march" shape his current work at the Srebrenica Memorial Centre?
- Hasan Hasanovic's harrowing journey exemplifies the experiences of thousands of Bosnian Muslim men and boys fleeing the Srebrenica genocide. Approximately 12,000 attempted the escape, with only about a third surviving the perilous journey.
- What are the long-term implications of the Srebrenica genocide and the ongoing struggle for historical accuracy and reconciliation?
- Hasanovic's work at the Srebrenica Memorial Centre, archiving survivor testimonies, ensures the remembrance of the genocide and serves as a vital record against future atrocities. His personal account underscores the enduring trauma and the necessity for historical accuracy and accountability.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative is structured around Hasanovic's personal journey, creating a powerful and empathetic account. This focus, while effective, might unintentionally overshadow the broader context of the genocide. The headline, if there was one (not provided in the text), could further influence reader interpretation; a headline focusing solely on Hasanovic's survival might downplay the larger scale of the tragedy.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and avoids inflammatory terms. While emotionally charged descriptions are used to convey the horror of the events, these are generally appropriate to the subject matter and used objectively. The author's use of the phrase "hunt for people," which might be replaced by something like "massacre", accurately describes the actions of the perpetrators.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the personal narrative of Hasan Hasanovic, offering a deeply moving account of his experience. However, it could benefit from incorporating broader perspectives, such as the experiences of women and children during the Srebrenica genocide, or a more detailed analysis of the international community's response and failures. While the article mentions the international community's presence through UN peacekeeping forces, it does not delve into the criticisms of their actions or inactions.
Gender Bias
The article centers on a male survivor's experience. While this perspective is valuable, it lacks the inclusion of female voices and perspectives which were also significantly impacted by the genocide. Adding accounts from women survivors would create a more balanced and representative portrayal of the event.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article describes the Srebrenica genocide, a mass killing of Bosniaks by Bosnian Serb forces. This event represents a grave violation of international humanitarian law and a severe setback for peace, justice, and strong institutions. The systematic nature of the killings, the targeting of civilians, and the subsequent denial of the genocide by some highlight the failure of institutions to prevent and punish atrocities. The long-term effects, including the ongoing trauma for survivors and the challenges of reconciliation, further underscore the negative impact on SDG 16.