dw.com
Srebrenica Survivor's Testimony: A Six-Day Ordeal
Hasan Hasanović, a 49-year-old Srebrenica genocide survivor, recounts his six-day ordeal during the 'death march' of July 1995, losing his father and brother, witnessing mass killings, and ultimately reaching safety, now working to archive survivor testimonies at the Srebrenica Memorial.
- What were the immediate consequences of the Srebrenica genocide's 'death march' for those who attempted to escape, exemplified by Hasan Hasanović's experiences?
- In July 1995, Hasan Hasanović, then 19, survived the Srebrenica genocide's 'death march,' a six-day ordeal involving constant shelling, lack of food and water, and witnessing mass killings. He lost his father and brother during the chaos and ultimately reached safety with hundreds of others.
- How did the systematic nature of the Srebrenica massacre, as depicted in Hasanović's journey, affect the survivors' lives and their efforts to cope with the trauma?
- Hasanović's experience exemplifies the brutality of the Srebrenica massacre, where approximately 8,372 Bosniaks were murdered. His six-day flight, witnessing atrocities and losing his family, highlights the sheer scale and systematic nature of the killings, with only about a third of those fleeing surviving. He now works at the Srebrenica Memorial, archiving survivor testimonies.
- What are the long-term implications of Hasanović's work archiving survivor testimonies for historical remembrance and the pursuit of justice regarding the Srebrenica genocide?
- Hasanović's work archiving survivor testimonies is crucial for preserving historical memory and ensuring accountability for the Srebrenica genocide. His personal story underscores the lasting trauma and the ongoing need for recognition of the crime, challenging denial and promoting understanding. His continued storytelling ensures that the victims' voices are heard.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the Srebrenica massacre through the lens of Hasan Hasanović's personal experience, which is a powerful and effective approach. However, this framing could be strengthened by more explicitly connecting Hasanović's story to the broader political and historical context of the conflict. For instance, expanding on the role of Ratko Mladić and the political motivations behind the massacre would provide more context for the reader to understand the personal narrative within a larger framework. The headline, if any, would greatly influence the framing; without it, it's difficult to assess headline-based framing bias.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and avoids charged terminology. While describing the events as a 'hunt for people' and 'massacre' is inherently negative, these are accurate and appropriate descriptions of the historical event. The article effectively conveys the horror of the experience without resorting to overly emotional or biased language. The use of terms like "surreal" adds emotional weight without compromising objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Hasan Hasanović's personal experience, offering a powerful firsthand account. However, it could benefit from including broader statistical data on the Srebrenica massacre, such as the total number of victims, the demographics of those killed, and the extent of international response. While the personal narrative is compelling, additional context would enhance the article's overall understanding of the event. The omission of these broader statistics might unintentionally downplay the scale of the genocide.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article describes the Srebrenica massacre, a genocide where thousands of men and boys were murdered. This event represents a severe breach of peace, justice, and strong institutions, highlighting the failure to prevent and punish such atrocities. The ongoing denial of the genocide by some also points to weak institutions and lack of accountability.