nos.nl
Stricter Enforcement of Disguised Employment Law Leads to Drop in Dutch Self-Employed Individuals
In December 2024, the Netherlands experienced a decrease of 6,776 self-employed individuals due to stricter enforcement against disguised employment; 21,303 self-employed individuals terminated their businesses, a 54% increase compared to December 2023, with significant impacts seen in healthcare and courier services.
- What are the potential long-term economic consequences of this trend, and how might the labor market adapt to these changes?
- The impact of stricter regulations on disguised employment remains to be seen in the coming months. While the initial effect shows a decrease in self-employment, particularly in high-risk sectors like healthcare and courier services, the long-term consequences for employment and the overall economy need further monitoring.
- Which sectors are most affected by the increase in self-employed individuals terminating their businesses, and what are the potential reasons?
- This significant drop, the first time since 2019 that terminations outnumbered new registrations, is directly linked to stricter enforcement against disguised employment. Larger organizations are avoiding the risk of penalties by reducing their reliance on self-employed contractors in sectors previously flagged for concern.
- What is the immediate impact of stricter enforcement against disguised employment on the number of self-employed individuals in the Netherlands?
- The Netherlands saw a decrease of 6,776 self-employed individuals (zzp'ers) in one month, primarily due to a 54% increase in terminations compared to December 2023. This follows stricter enforcement of legislation against disguised employment, impacting sectors like healthcare (with a 79% increase in terminations) and courier services.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and opening paragraph immediately highlight the decrease in the number of zzp'ers and its connection to stricter enforcement. This sets a frame that emphasizes the negative impact of the enforcement on the number of self-employed workers. While the article later mentions an increase in the total number of zzp'ers in 2024, this positive element is presented less prominently than the reported decrease. This framing might lead readers to focus primarily on the negative consequences of the stricter rules.
Language Bias
The language used is mostly neutral and factual. Terms like "duidelijk omslagpunt" (clear turning point) could be considered slightly loaded, suggesting a significant shift rather than just a change in numbers. The use of the phrase "gooiden het bijltje erbij neer" (threw in the towel) is somewhat informal, but it doesn't appear to carry a strong bias. Overall, the language is descriptive and avoids overtly emotional or evaluative terms.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the decrease in self-employed professionals (zzp'ers) in the Netherlands, primarily attributing it to stricter enforcement against disguised employment. However, it omits exploring alternative reasons for the decline, such as economic downturn, changes in the job market, or individual career choices unrelated to the stricter enforcement. While acknowledging that the data doesn't show whether those who stopped being zzp'ers found employment elsewhere, it doesn't delve into potential broader economic factors influencing this trend. This omission limits the analysis and the ability to form a complete understanding of the situation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view by strongly linking the decrease in zzp'ers to stricter enforcement against disguised employment. While this is a significant factor, it doesn't fully explore other potential contributing factors, creating a false dichotomy between stricter enforcement and the decline. It overlooks the complexity of the situation and the possible interplay of multiple causes.
Sustainable Development Goals
The decrease in the number of self-employed individuals (zzp