aljazeera.com
Sudan Conflict: 14 Million Displaced, 32,973 Dead
The Sudanese conflict between the SAF and RSF, beginning April 15, 2023, has resulted in over 14 million displaced people, at least 32,973 reported deaths, and widespread destruction, with Khartoum as the epicenter of violence.
- What are the potential long-term regional and international consequences of the unresolved Sudanese conflict?
- The Sudanese conflict's long-term consequences include lasting damage to infrastructure, a protracted humanitarian crisis requiring substantial international aid, and potential regional instability due to cross-border displacement. The lack of a clear resolution creates further uncertainty regarding the country's future stability and economic recovery.
- What is the immediate impact of the ongoing conflict in Sudan on its civilian population and neighboring countries?
- The war in Sudan, ongoing since April 15, 2023, has caused a massive displacement crisis, forcing over 14 million people to flee their homes. The conflict, primarily between the SAF and RSF, has resulted in at least 32,973 reported deaths and widespread destruction, including the damage of 49 aircraft at Khartoum airport.
- What are the main contributing factors to the geographical concentration of violence in Khartoum, Gezira, and North Darfur?
- The conflict's intensity, measured by 11,292 recorded attacks from April 2023 to March 2025, shows the SAF responsible for 50 percent and the RSF for 38 percent. Khartoum, Gezira, and North Darfur experienced the most intense fighting, highlighting the conflict's geographical spread and impact on civilian populations.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the scale of violence and displacement, creating a sense of overwhelming crisis. While accurate, this emphasis might overshadow the political negotiations and diplomatic efforts that might be underway. The headline and opening paragraphs set this tone immediately.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual, relying on statistics and reports from organizations like ACLED and the UN. However, terms like "brutal struggle" and "battlegrounds" might carry a slightly negative connotation.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the numbers and locations of attacks, but it lacks detailed information on the root causes of the conflict, the political motivations of the involved parties, and the international efforts to resolve the crisis. It also omits discussion of the humanitarian aid efforts and their effectiveness.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a somewhat simplified view of the conflict as a struggle between two main forces (SAF and RSF), neglecting the roles of other groups like the Darfur militias. The complexity of the conflict and the diverse actors involved are not fully explored.
Gender Bias
The article primarily focuses on the actions and roles of male leaders (al-Burhan and Hemedti). While the conflict's impact on women and girls is implicitly acknowledged through the mention of displacement, a more detailed analysis of gendered impacts would be beneficial.
Sustainable Development Goals
The conflict has caused widespread displacement, destruction of infrastructure, and economic disruption, pushing millions into poverty and exacerbating existing inequalities.