bbc.com
Sudan Conflict Timeline: From Framework Agreement to UN Resolution Failure
This timeline details the key events in Sudan's ongoing conflict, from a framework agreement in 2022 to the failure of a UN Security Council resolution in 2024, highlighting the international community's struggles to resolve the crisis.
- What were the key positions of various international actors regarding the resolution, and what were their justifications?
- The conflict between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces escalated from April 2023, despite peace negotiations involving the US and Saudi Arabia. International efforts to mediate, including a UN resolution calling for a ceasefire, proved unsuccessful.
- What were the main events leading up to the failure of the British-drafted UN Security Council resolution concerning the Sudanese conflict?
- The timeline details key events in Sudan's conflict, starting with the December 2022 framework agreement aiming for a civilian-led transition, and culminating in the failure of a British-drafted UN Security Council resolution in August 2024.
- How has the conflict in Sudan unfolded, including the role of external actors, the ongoing humanitarian crisis, and the various attempts at conflict resolution?
- Russia's veto of the British resolution highlights the international community's struggle to effectively address the conflict, while the Sudanese government criticized the proposal as an attempt to impose guardianship.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative emphasizes the failure of international interventions, particularly the vetoed UN resolution, framing the conflict as primarily an external problem that international actors are struggling to resolve, potentially underplaying the roles of internal actors and domestic dynamics.
Language Bias
The article uses neutral language mostly, but some descriptions of the conflict, like "failed attempts" or "struggle to mediate," could subtly shape perceptions of international efforts.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the conflict's violence and the international community's failed attempts to mediate, potentially omitting the perspectives of civilian populations and the underlying political and economic factors contributing to the conflict. This selective reporting might skew readers' understanding.
False Dichotomy
The article frames the conflict primarily as a binary struggle between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces, potentially overlooking the complexity of the conflict's internal and external factors, alliances, and motivations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The conflict in Sudan represents a major setback for peace, justice, and strong institutions within the country and wider region. The ongoing violence and humanitarian crisis undermine the rule of law, create instability, and hinder efforts to build strong and accountable governance structures.