lemonde.fr
Sudan: Famine Threatens Khartoum as Civil War Worsens
The World Food Programme (WFP) warns of severe famine risks in areas south of Khartoum, Sudan, due to the ongoing civil war since April 2023, causing widespread destruction, limited access to resources, and a cholera outbreak, affecting nearly 25 million people facing severe food insecurity.
- What is the immediate humanitarian crisis in areas south of Khartoum, Sudan, and what are its most significant consequences?
- The World Food Programme (WFP) warns of severe famine risks in areas south of Khartoum, Sudan, due to the ongoing civil war. Djebel Aulia, 40km south of Khartoum, shows critically high hunger levels, with widespread destruction, limited access to basic necessities, and a cholera outbreak impacting the region. The WFP urges immediate international funding to prevent famine and support reconstruction.
- How has the ongoing Sudanese civil war contributed to the current food insecurity crisis, and what are its broader implications for the region?
- The Sudanese civil war, ongoing since April 2023, has created the world's worst humanitarian crisis, according to the UN, with tens of thousands dead. The conflict has caused widespread destruction and displacement, straining already limited resources in areas like Khartoum, leading to severe food insecurity affecting nearly 25 million people. The return of displaced people to damaged areas exacerbates this crisis.
- What are the long-term systemic impacts of this crisis on Sudan's stability, infrastructure, and overall socio-economic development, and what international strategies could effectively mitigate these impacts?
- The WFP's warning highlights the escalating humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan. Failure to secure sufficient international funding risks widespread famine, particularly in areas south of Khartoum. The long-term consequences include protracted instability, mass displacement, and potentially irreversible damage to Sudan's infrastructure and social fabric. The situation demands a comprehensive and sustained international response.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the severity of the famine risk, using strong language such as "severe" levels of hunger and "immense" needs. The headline and opening sentences immediately highlight the crisis, setting a tone of urgency and alarm. While this accurately reflects the situation, it might overshadow other aspects of the humanitarian crisis.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, employing quotes from the WFP director to convey the severity of the situation. Words like "severe," "immense," and "urgent" reflect the gravity of the famine threat without being overly sensationalized. The use of direct quotes helps maintain objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the famine threat in areas south of Khartoum, but omits details about the overall humanitarian situation in other parts of Sudan, beyond mentioning famine declarations in five zones and insecurity in Darfur. While it mentions the war and displacement, a broader context of the conflict's impact on food production and distribution networks would enrich the analysis. The article also doesn't detail the specific challenges faced by different demographics, such as women and children, in accessing aid.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article reports a high risk of famine in areas south of Khartoum due to the ongoing civil war. This directly impacts food security and exacerbates existing hunger issues. The quote "Several zones south of the city are facing a high risk of famine" highlights the severity of the situation and the potential for widespread starvation. The mention of 25 million people suffering from severe food insecurity further underscores the immense scale of the problem and its direct negative impact on SDG 2: Zero Hunger.