dw.com
Sudanese Army Advances in Khartoum, Announces Post-War Roadmap
On February 9th, 2025, the Sudanese army intensified its offensive against the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Khartoum, regaining control of several areas east of the city and bombing RSF positions; simultaneously, allied forces bombed RSF positions in Al Fasher, Darfur, while the government announced a post-war roadmap.
- What are the immediate consequences of the Sudanese army's intensified offensive in Khartoum?
- The Sudanese army expanded its control in Khartoum's outskirts on February 9th, 2025, bombing paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) positions. They regained control of several eastern Khartoum localities and advanced toward a "key sector" of the city, aiming to take the center. This marks a significant expansion in eastern neighborhoods.
- How does the Sudanese army's recent success in Wad Madani influence its current offensive in Khartoum?
- This offensive follows the army's recapture of Wad Madani, cutting a major RSF supply line. The army's advance aims to encircle and expel the RSF from Khartoum, a goal pursued since the war's start in April 2023. Simultaneous bombings targeted RSF positions in Al Fasher, Darfur.
- What are the potential long-term challenges to implementing the Sudanese government's proposed post-war roadmap?
- The Sudanese government proposed a post-war roadmap including forming a transitional government and holding free elections. This plan, contingent on recapturing Khartoum, aims to address the devastation caused by nearly two years of conflict, including tens of thousands of deaths and millions displaced. The success of this roadmap hinges on the military's ability to secure a complete victory.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and opening sentences emphasize the Sudanese army's military advancements, setting a tone that favors their narrative. The sequencing of information prioritizes positive developments for the army, while the humanitarian and political consequences are relegated to the later part of the article. The use of words like "recovered" and "expanded significantly" conveys a sense of triumph that might not be fully representative of the overall situation.
Language Bias
While largely factual, the article uses language that subtly favors the Sudanese army. Words such as 'recovered control' and 'significant expansion' carry positive connotations and present the military advances in a favorable light. More neutral terms such as 'gained control' or 'advanced into' could have been used to present a more objective picture.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on military gains by the Sudanese army, potentially omitting civilian casualties or the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Khartoum. The perspective of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) is largely absent, limiting a complete understanding of the conflict. The article mentions a proposed roadmap for postwar recovery but lacks detail on its contents and potential challenges to implementation. The inclusion of only positive statements from the Sudanese government might indicate a bias towards its narrative.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the conflict, portraying it primarily as a struggle between the Sudanese army and the RSF. The complexities of the conflict, such as the involvement of various tribal groups and international actors, are not fully explored. The narrative implicitly frames the situation as a clear-cut victory for one side, rather than a nuanced conflict with multiple facets.
Sustainable Development Goals
The Sudanese army's offensive to reclaim Khartoum and the proposed roadmap for post-war recovery and elections demonstrate efforts towards restoring peace, justice, and strong institutions in Sudan. The offensive aims to end the conflict, while the roadmap points towards establishing a stable government and holding elections, crucial steps in building a peaceful and just society.