nrc.nl
Sudanese Army Gains Ground Amidst Humanitarian Crisis
The Sudanese army is gaining ground against the RSF in the 21-month-old conflict, retaking key areas, while the RSF attacks infrastructure; the conflict is fueled by historical grievances, economic competition, and foreign intervention, causing a major humanitarian crisis.
- What are the immediate consequences of the Sudanese army's recent advances against the RSF?
- The Sudanese government army is making slow but steady progress against the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), recently recapturing Wad Madani and nearing Khartoum's airport. The RSF responded with drone attacks on the Merowe dam. The U.S. recently designated the RSF as a genocidal group, a diplomatic win for the government.
- How do historical power imbalances and economic factors contribute to the ongoing conflict in Sudan?
- The conflict stems from a power struggle between the Sudanese army and the RSF, rooted in historical grievances and economic competition. The army, historically concentrated along the Nile, neglected peripheral regions, creating resentment fueling the RSF's rise. The conflict escalated after a 2021 coup.
- What are the long-term implications of the UAE's involvement in the Sudanese conflict and the humanitarian crisis's impact on the stability of the region?
- The UAE's arming of the RSF, despite U.S. condemnation, highlights the complex geopolitical dynamics. The conflict's impact on food security and infrastructure is devastating, with millions affected and limited international aid. The army's capacity to maintain any gains remains uncertain.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is largely neutral, presenting multiple perspectives and avoiding strong editorializing. While the article details the recent gains of the Sudanese army, it also highlights the RSF's actions and the humanitarian crisis. The headline (if any) would determine whether framing bias exists, but based on the text alone it appears neutral.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and objective. While terms like "meedogenloze militie" (ruthless militia) and "koppige strijdheren" (stubborn warlords) might be considered slightly loaded, they are used descriptively within the context of the conflict and do not significantly skew the overall presentation.
Bias by Omission
The article provides a comprehensive overview of the conflict, but omits details on the specific types of weapons used by each side and the level of international involvement beyond the mentioned countries. Further, the article doesn't delve into the potential long-term impacts of the conflict on the region's stability.
Sustainable Development Goals
The ongoing conflict in Sudan, marked by violence, human rights abuses, and a breakdown of governance, severely undermines peace, justice, and the functioning of state institutions. The conflict is rooted in power struggles between the Sudanese army and the RSF, exacerbating existing societal divisions and hindering efforts to establish stable and accountable governance.