t24.com.tr
Sudanese Army Recaptured Khartoum
After two years of civil war, Sudan's army, led by General Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan, recaptured Khartoum from the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in late March 2025, marking a turning point in the conflict that began in April 2023.
- What factors contributed to the shift in the balance of power in the Sudanese civil war?
- The conflict began in April 2023, when the RSF attacked the army headquarters. Initially, the RSF controlled much of the country, but the army's recapture of Khartoum marks a turning point, aided by support from Egypt, Iran, and Russia. The RSF's inability to govern effectively contributed to their losses.
- What is the immediate significance of the Sudanese army's recapture of Khartoum after two years of civil war?
- The Sudanese army, led by General Al-Burhan, recaptured Khartoum from the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) after two years of civil war. This victory shifts the balance of power, but the conflict's underlying issues remain unresolved, with the RSF likely to focus on Darfur. Thousands have died and millions displaced.
- What are the long-term implications of the Sudanese civil war's current phase, and what is the outlook for sustainable peace?
- The conflict's long-term consequences include potential further instability in Darfur, continued humanitarian crisis, and questions about the legitimacy of Al-Burhan's rule. The army's victory doesn't guarantee peace; the underlying political issues causing the conflict require resolution for lasting stability. The future of Sudan hinges on a civilian-led government and the army's withdrawal from politics.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the Sudanese army's recapture of Khartoum as a victory and liberation, while downplaying the immense suffering of the Sudanese people. The headline and introduction emphasize Al-Burhan's actions and presentation, reinforcing a narrative that favors the military perspective and minimizes the civilian cost of the war. The author's strong disapproval of Al-Burhan's actions is evident, creating a biased framing against the Sudanese army.
Language Bias
The author uses strong, emotionally charged language such as "devasa mezalimin" (massive atrocities), "kana bulayarak" (drowning in blood), and "perişan eden" (ravaged). While expressing valid concerns, this language lacks the neutrality expected in objective reporting. The descriptions of Al-Burhan's actions are consistently negative, while the narrative surrounding the RSF is heavily critical. More neutral language and a more balanced presentation of both sides would improve the article's objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the conflict between the Sudanese army and the RSF, but omits significant details about the root causes of the conflict, such as the long history of political instability and ethnic tensions in Sudan. The role of external actors, beyond mentioning Russia and the UAE, in supporting both sides of the conflict is not sufficiently explored. The article also neglects to mention the perspectives of various civilian groups and their experiences during the war.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified dichotomy between the Sudanese army and the RSF, neglecting the complexities of the conflict and the involvement of various factions and tribal groups. It implies that the conflict is solely between two opposing armies, without adequately exploring the political and social dimensions of the conflict.
Gender Bias
The article doesn't contain overt gender bias; however, it primarily focuses on the actions of male military leaders, overlooking the experiences and perspectives of women in the conflict. The article would benefit from including the experiences of women affected by the war.
Sustainable Development Goals
The ongoing conflict in Sudan, marked by intense fighting between the Sudanese army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has resulted in a devastating humanitarian crisis. The conflict has caused immense suffering, with tens of thousands of deaths, millions of displaced people, and widespread human rights abuses. The lack of a stable and legitimate government, further exacerbated by the military's involvement in politics, undermines the rule of law and prospects for peace and justice. The situation highlights the failure of institutions to maintain peace and security, and the urgent need for a transition to civilian rule.