dw.com
Sudanese Army Reclaims Khartoum Airport, Battles Continue
The Sudanese army announced the recapture of Khartoum International Airport from the RSF, claiming to be encircling the strategic Jebel Awliya area and pushing RSF fighters towards the White Nile state. This follows the army's previous successes but comes after accusations of a deadly air strike that killed nearly 270 in West Darfur.
- What is the immediate impact of the Sudanese army's recapture of Khartoum airport and surrounding areas?
- The Sudanese army has regained control of Khartoum airport, pushing RSF fighters toward the White Nile state via Jebel Awliya bridge. The army claims to be encircling Jebel Awliya, a strategic location south of Khartoum, and continues fighting in that area. Despite this, gunfire persists in Khartoum.
- How does the recent army offensive against RSF fighters relate to broader patterns of violence and civilian casualties in Sudan?
- The Sudanese army's recapture of Khartoum airport signifies a major gain in their ongoing campaign against the RSF. This follows the army's recent successes in reclaiming the presidential palace and other government buildings. The army's intensified offensive, bolstered by increased forces and weaponry, appears to be pushing the RSF out of the capital.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of the ongoing conflict, considering both the army's gains and allegations of civilian targeting?
- The Sudanese army's advance, while significant, occurs amidst accusations of a deadly air strike in West Darfur that killed approximately 270 people. This raises concerns about civilian casualties and the potential for further escalation. The long-term implications hinge on whether the army can maintain its momentum and secure lasting peace.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the military's actions positively, emphasizing their successes and downplaying their alleged atrocities (mentioned briefly). The headline (if any) would likely focus on the military's recapture of the airport. The sequencing prioritizes the military's claims and achievements, placing the accusations of the aerial attack in Darfur later in the piece, minimizing its apparent impact on the overall narrative.
Language Bias
While largely neutral in tone, the article uses phrases like 'kabambe' (meaning 'massive' or 'large-scale' in Swahili, the choice of this word may carry connotations of strength) which implicitly favor the military. The phrase "wanamgambo wakiondoka" (militia leaving) could be seen as more neutral than phrases suggesting a 'rout' or 'defeat'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the military's perspective and successes, omitting potential counter-narratives from the RSF. Casualties and suffering on both sides are mentioned but details are limited, and the impact on civilians is not fully explored. The article also lacks information on international efforts to mediate the conflict. There is no mention of perspectives from humanitarian organizations or other international actors involved in the crisis.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a somewhat simplistic view of the conflict as a clear-cut struggle between the Sudanese army and the RSF, neglecting the complexities of the situation and the involvement of various other actors and societal factors. It is presented as a fight for control of Khartoum, neglecting wider conflicts across the country.
Gender Bias
The article lacks specific details about gender impacts; there's no explicit gender bias, but the focus on military actions and territorial control means the experiences of women and girls in the conflict are largely absent.
Sustainable Development Goals
The ongoing conflict in Sudan, involving the Sudanese army and the RSF, has resulted in significant loss of life, displacement, and human rights abuses. The conflict undermines peace, justice, and the stability of institutions within the country. The article highlights the ongoing fighting, the army's offensive, and the displacement of civilians, all of which directly contradict the goals of SDG 16.