dw.com
Sudanese Civil War: Humanitarian Crisis of Unprecedented Scale
Sudan's two-year civil war, between General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, has created the world's largest humanitarian crisis, affecting 64% of the population, causing an estimated 150,000 casualties, and displacing millions.
- What are the root causes of the conflict, and how do external actors influence the ongoing violence?
- The conflict stems from a power struggle between General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, who seized power in a 2021 coup. Their April 2023 disagreement over integrating paramilitary forces into the army ignited the current war, marked by atrocities like widespread sexual violence and the destruction of civilian infrastructure.
- What are the immediate humanitarian consequences of the Sudanese civil war, and how does it rank globally in terms of severity?
- The Sudanese civil war, ongoing for two years, has created the world's largest humanitarian crisis, with 64% of the population (over 50 million) depending on aid and nearly 25 million facing chronic hunger. Around 12 million Sudanese are internally displaced, and 3.4 million have fled to neighboring countries, while casualties are estimated at 150,000.
- What are the long-term societal and economic implications of this protracted conflict, and what are the prospects for future stability and recovery?
- The war's devastating impact extends beyond immediate casualties, crippling Sudan's economy and deepening societal divisions. Reduced international aid, coupled with internal displacement and a fractured political landscape (76 political parties), hinders recovery. The conflict's future trajectory depends heavily on the outcome of the power struggle and the availability of international assistance.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the conflict largely through the lens of the humanitarian crisis and the suffering of civilians. While this is crucial, the narrative's structure could benefit from a more balanced representation of the different perspectives and actors in the conflict, potentially giving equal weight to the political and military aspects. The emphasis on suffering, while appropriate, risks overshadowing the political dimensions that led to the crisis.
Language Bias
The article uses strong language to describe the atrocities committed, such as "mass sexual assaults" and "gruesome videos." While conveying the gravity of the situation, this language might be perceived as emotionally charged. More neutral phrasing, such as "widespread reports of sexual violence" and "videos depicting violence against civilians," could be considered while retaining impact. The repeated use of descriptions like "ruthless" and "merciless" could be toned down for more objective reporting.
Bias by Omission
The article provides a comprehensive overview of the humanitarian crisis in Sudan, detailing the conflict's impact on civilians, including women and girls who face widespread sexual violence. However, it could benefit from including diverse voices beyond the quoted individuals, such as perspectives from humanitarian workers on the ground or representatives from affected communities. Further, while the article mentions the economic impact, a deeper dive into the specific economic consequences and their effect on the humanitarian crisis would enrich the analysis. The article also lacks information on the role of international organizations beyond the UN, potentially omitting other significant actors involved in the relief efforts.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a clear conflict between two generals, but it could explore the complexities of the conflict further by acknowledging potential internal divisions within the Sudanese army and the RSF, as well as the involvement of external actors and their influence. It simplifies the conflict to primarily a struggle between two leaders, potentially neglecting other political factions, tribal dynamics or underlying causes.
Gender Bias
The article explicitly highlights the disproportionate impact of the conflict on women and girls, focusing on the widespread sexual violence they experience. This demonstrates a sensitivity to gendered impacts of conflict. However, it could benefit from a broader analysis of gender roles in the conflict and the ways in which gender shapes power dynamics and access to resources.
Sustainable Development Goals
The conflict in Sudan has resulted in widespread food insecurity, with nearly 25 million people affected by chronic hunger. This directly contradicts SDG 2, which aims to end hunger, achieve food security, and improve nutrition.