Supernovas May Have Caused Two of Earth's Mass Extinctions

Supernovas May Have Caused Two of Earth's Mass Extinctions

us.cnn.com

Supernovas May Have Caused Two of Earth's Mass Extinctions

New research hypothesizes that nearby supernovas, occurring approximately every 500 million years based on calculations from the Gaia space telescope, may have caused the Late Ordovician and Late Devonian mass extinctions by damaging Earth's ozone layer, though direct evidence is lacking.

English
United States
OtherScienceMass ExtinctionSupernovaLate OrdovicianGaia TelescopeLate DevonianExtinctions
Keele UniversityUniversity Of AlicanteEuropean Space AgencyUniversity Of BristolUniversity Of LeedsMonthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society
Nick WrightAlexis QuintanaMike BentonPaul Wignall
What is the primary finding of the study regarding the potential link between nearby supernovas and mass extinction events on Earth?
A new study suggests that two of Earth's largest mass extinctions, the Late Ordovician and Late Devonian, may have been caused by nearby supernovas. Calculations indicate a supernova could impact Earth every 500 million years, aligning with the timing of these events. This hypothesis proposes that radiation from these explosions damaged Earth's ozone layer, initiating a chain reaction leading to mass extinction.
What specific types of evidence would be required to definitively confirm or refute the hypothesis that supernovas caused the Late Ordovician and Late Devonian extinction events?
Future research needs to find evidence linking supernovae to these extinctions. Identifying specific elements such as iron-60 or plutonium, or quantifying past ozone depletion in geological records could provide the necessary evidence to confirm this theory. Until then, the supernova hypothesis remains a plausible explanation, albeit one needing more substantial evidence.
How do the researchers' calculations of supernova frequency compare to previous estimations, and what implications does this have for understanding potential causes of mass extinction?
The research team analyzed data from the Gaia space telescope, focusing on nearby massive stars within 65 light-years of the sun. Their calculations suggest a lower supernova rate than previously assumed, leading them to explore the potential link between these events and mass extinctions. This contrasts with the well-established asteroid impact theory for the dinosaur extinction, which is supported by strong evidence of an iridium anomaly.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article's framing emphasizes the novelty and potential impact of the supernova theory. The headline and introduction immediately highlight the connection between supernovas and mass extinctions, creating a strong initial impression that may disproportionately influence the reader's perception before other explanations are considered. The inclusion of quotes from researchers supporting the theory further reinforces this framing. The counterarguments are presented later and less prominently.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is generally neutral, but there are instances of potentially loaded terms, particularly in the description of the supernova's effects as "devastating." While accurately describing the impact, the word "devastating" carries a stronger emotional charge than a more neutral term like "significant" or "damaging." The use of phrases like "cataclysmic events" and "dooming the dinosaurs" also adds a layer of dramatic emphasis.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the supernova theory without fully exploring other potential contributing factors to the mass extinction events. While it mentions volcanic eruptions as a possible factor in other extinctions, it doesn't delve into the specifics of how volcanic activity might have interacted with potential supernova effects or been a primary cause in the Late Ordovician and Late Devonian extinctions. The article also omits discussion of alternative hypotheses for these extinction events.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by focusing primarily on the supernova hypothesis as a potential explanation for the mass extinctions, without giving equal weight to other possible causes like volcanic eruptions or other environmental factors. While acknowledging that multiple events often contribute to mass extinctions, the framing disproportionately emphasizes the supernova theory.

2/5

Gender Bias

The article features several male scientists prominently (Wright, Benton, Wignall), and quotes them extensively on the topic. While a female scientist (Quintana) is mentioned, her input is presented less prominently. This could contribute to a subtle bias towards male perspectives in the reporting of the scientific findings.

Sustainable Development Goals

Life on Land Negative
Direct Relevance

The research suggests that supernovas may have caused mass extinctions on Earth, wiping out early land plants and animals during the Late Devonian extinction event. This directly impacts the biodiversity and ecosystems on land, hindering progress towards sustainable land management and conservation.