us.cnn.com
Supreme Court Remands Death Row Inmate's Case
The Supreme Court sends the case of death row inmate Joseph Smith back to lower courts for a re-evaluation of his intellectual disability claim.
English
United States
JusticeHuman Rights ViolationsUs PoliticsSupreme CourtDeath PenaltyLegal CaseIntellectual Disability
Supreme Court11Th Us Circuit Court Of Appeals
Joseph SmithClarence ThomasNeil GorsuchDurk Van DamRichard Glossip
- What is the current status of Smith's case?
- The Supreme Court's decision to remand the case back to the lower court indicates uncertainty about the lower court's reasoning. The court may still decide to hear the underlying questions in the future, suggesting the issue remains unresolved.
- How did Justices Thomas and Gorsuch dissent?
- Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented, preferring to hear the case immediately. This suggests a division among the justices regarding the handling of intellectual disability claims in death penalty cases.
- What is the main legal issue in Smith's case?
- Smith's IQ scores were just above the threshold for intellectual disability, leading to debate about whether other factors should be considered. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals instructed a lower court to examine additional factors beyond IQ scores.
- What is the significance of the Supreme Court's 2002 ruling?
- The Supreme Court's 2002 ruling prohibits executing intellectually disabled inmates, creating a need for clear standards in assessing intellectual disability claims. The ambiguity in Smith's case highlights the ongoing challenges in applying this ruling.
- What was the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Joseph Smith?
- The Supreme Court sent the case of Joseph Smith, an Alabama death row inmate, back to a lower court for reconsideration. The issue is whether lower courts correctly determined Smith's intellectual disability, impacting his death penalty eligibility.