theglobeandmail.com
Supreme Court Scrutinizes Nvidia's Securities Fraud Case
The Supreme Court considers Nvidia's appeal against a securities fraud lawsuit alleging the company misled investors about its cryptocurrency market reliance.
English
Canada
Us PoliticsTechnologyArtificial IntelligenceFinanceLawsuitSupreme CourtFraud
NvidiaE. Ohman J:or Fonder AbSupreme Court9Th U.s. Circuit Court Of AppealsPrysm Group
Jensen HuangElena KaganKetanji Brown JacksonJohn RobertsNeil GorsuchBrett KavanaughJoe BidenNeal KatyalDeepak Gupta
- What is the main legal issue in the Supreme Court case involving Nvidia?
- The Supreme Court heard arguments in Nvidia’s appeal against a securities fraud lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges Nvidia misled investors about its cryptocurrency market dependence. The justices expressed reservations about intervening, questioning their ability to resolve the complex technical aspects.
- How did cryptocurrency mining affect Nvidia's business and the subsequent lawsuit?
- Nvidia's revenue growth was significantly influenced by cryptocurrency mining in 2017 and 2018. When cryptocurrency profitability declined, Nvidia's revenue fell short of projections, causing its stock price to drop. Plaintiffs argue Nvidia concealed the impact of crypto mining on its business.
- Who are the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against Nvidia, and what are their accusations?
- The plaintiffs, led by E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB, accuse Nvidia and its CEO, Jensen Huang, of violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. They seek unspecified monetary damages for the lost value of Nvidia stock. Nvidia settled separate charges with US authorities in 2022 for $5.5 million, without admitting or denying wrongdoing.
- What is the significance of the 1995 Private Securities Litigation Reform Act in this case?
- The case questions whether the plaintiffs met the heightened legal bar for private securities fraud suits, as defined by the 1995 Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Justices debated the appropriate balance between requiring sufficient evidence and avoiding overly burdensome requirements on plaintiffs. The court's decision could impact future securities fraud litigation.
- What is the expected timeline for the Supreme Court's ruling, and what is its potential broader impact?
- The Supreme Court's decision is anticipated by the end of June. The case, along with a similar one involving Meta, could make it harder to hold companies accountable for alleged securities fraud. The court's ruling will impact the legal standards for private securities fraud lawsuits.