elpais.com
Syme's Tacitus: A Review of Gredos's New Translation
Gredos Editorial's new translation of Tacitus's works, reviewed through the lens of Ronald Syme's historical analysis, reveals the enduring relevance of Roman political dynamics and the tension between liberty and security.
- What is the central theme highlighted by both Syme and Tacitus's works regarding Roman history?
- Both Syme and Tacitus emphasize the persistent struggle between liberty and security within the Roman political system. This theme is explored through the examination of power dynamics, the rise of the empire, and the changing roles of senators and citizens.
- How does Syme's analysis of Tacitus contribute to our understanding of the Roman Empire's evolution?
- Syme's work provides insight into the transition from the Roman Republic to the Empire, detailing the consolidation of power by dynasties and the shift from republican ideals to imperial rule. He shows how the elite's prioritization of security and wealth over active political participation contributed to this transition.
- What are the long-term implications of the power dynamics and political choices discussed in Tacitus's writings, as analyzed by Syme?
- The choices made by the Roman elite—prioritizing security and personal gain over active political participation—led to the decline of republican ideals and the rise of an autocratic empire. This highlights the enduring tension between individual liberty and the security offered by a powerful state, a tension relevant to societies even today.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The review heavily emphasizes the positive aspects of the book, praising its translation and historical significance. While it acknowledges the complexities of Tacitus's position within the Roman Empire, the overall framing leans towards admiration for both Tacitus and Syme's work, potentially overshadowing potential criticisms or alternative interpretations.
Language Bias
The language used is largely laudatory, employing terms like "magno tributo", "más grande historiador romano", and "saber infinito." While these are descriptive, they carry a positive connotation that could influence the reader's perception. More neutral alternatives might include "significant contribution," "important Roman historian," and "extensive knowledge.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses primarily on the political aspects of Tacitus's work and Syme's interpretation. Other aspects of Tacitus's writing, such as his literary style or the impact of his works beyond political history, are omitted. This omission might limit a complete understanding of Tacitus's contribution.
False Dichotomy
The review presents a somewhat simplified view of Tacitus's position, portraying him as existing between "nostalgia republicana" and "aceptación resignada del Imperio." This oversimplification neglects the potential nuances and complexities of his political stance.
Gender Bias
The review mentions several women (Livia, Mesalina) but primarily in relation to their roles in palace intrigues. This focus on their involvement in power dynamics, without further examination of their agency or perspectives beyond their relationships to men, could be considered a form of gender bias.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the Roman transition from Republic to Empire, highlighting the recurring tension between liberty and security, and the impact of power structures on governance. Tacitus's work, as analyzed, offers insights into the dynamics of political systems, leadership, and the rule of law in ancient Rome. This directly relates to SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.