lexpress.fr
Syria's New Leader: A Facade of Moderation Masks Concerning Intentions
Following his takeover of Damascus on December 8th, Ahmed al-Charaa (formerly Abou Mohammed al-Joulani) has adopted a diplomatic facade, promising minority rights and appointing women to high positions, while simultaneously attempting to Islamize the education system and appointing individuals with problematic pasts, raising concerns about his long-term intentions for Syria.
- What immediate changes or impacts resulted from al-Charaa's shift in public image and promises of moderation?
- After seizing Damascus on December 8th, Abou Mohammed al-Joulani, now known as Ahmed al-Charaa, has dramatically altered his public image, trading his military attire for suits and his militant rhetoric for diplomatic language. This shift includes purported commitments to respecting minorities and women's rights, although restrictions remain in Idlib. Al-Charaa's government has appointed women to high positions, including governor and central bank governor, unprecedented in Syria.
- How do the backgrounds and actions of al-Charaa's appointees influence the credibility of his claims of reform and inclusivity?
- Al-Charaa's transformation aims to secure Western support and sanctions relief. The US Treasury partially lifted sanctions for six months, and removed al-Charaa from its terrorist list, despite a $10 million bounty. However, attempts to rewrite school curricula, replacing 'defense of the nation' with 'defense of God' and removing references to evolution and prominent historical figures like Queen Zenobia, reveal underlying Islamist views.
- What are the long-term implications of al-Charaa's governance for the future of Syria, particularly considering the potential for consolidating power and the inconsistencies between his public image and the actions of his administration?
- Al-Charaa's power consolidation is concerning. Despite the initial concessions, his plans for a new constitution and elections suggest a prolonged stay in power, enabling him to reshape Syrian society according to his vision. The backgrounds of his appointees, including the Justice Minister implicated in past executions and a spokesperson questioning women's leadership roles, further raise red flags about the regime's true nature. The timeline for the transition, with a potential four-year control by al-Charaa, highlights the risks associated with his pledges of moderation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames al-Charaa's actions through the lens of his attempts to gain Western support and legitimacy. While his diplomatic efforts are detailed, the article does not provide equal weight to potential domestic factors driving his decisions or alternative interpretations of his actions. The headline (if any) would significantly influence the reader's perception, potentially emphasizing the deceptive nature of al-Charaa's actions.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language, such as describing al-Charaa as "dangerous" and his attempts at moderation as a "veneer." These terms carry negative connotations and preempt a balanced assessment of his actions. More neutral terms, such as "controversial" or "strategic," could be used to maintain objectivity. The repeated emphasis on al-Charaa's past actions, even when discussing current events, might unduly influence the reader's perception of his present intentions.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the actions and statements of al-Charaa, potentially omitting other significant actors or perspectives within the Syrian political landscape. The long-term consequences of al-Charaa's rule beyond the immediate political maneuvers are largely unexplored. The perspectives of ordinary Syrian citizens, beyond brief mentions of protests, are largely absent, limiting a full understanding of the population's response to these changes.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a dichotomy between al-Charaa's public image of moderation and the underlying concerns about his true intentions and past actions. This framing simplifies the complex political reality in Syria, reducing it to a simple 'moderate' versus 'extremist' narrative, overlooking nuances and potentially beneficial aspects of his rule.
Gender Bias
While the article highlights the unprecedented appointment of women to high-ranking positions, it also includes statements from a government spokesperson questioning women's capabilities based on "biological and psychological" factors. This creates a contradictory narrative, potentially undermining the significance of the women's appointments and perpetuating gender stereotypes. Further analysis of the women's roles and influence would provide a more nuanced perspective.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the appointment of individuals with problematic pasts to key positions in the Syrian government. Shadi al-Waisi, the Minister of Justice, is implicated in the execution of women, and Obaida Arnaout, the government spokesperson, expresses discriminatory views against women in leadership roles. These actions undermine efforts to establish just and accountable institutions and promote gender equality. The long transition timeline also raises concerns about the potential for prolonged instability and manipulation of power.