dw.com
Tasoulas Wins First Round of Greek Presidential Elections, Breaking with Tradition
In Greece's first round of presidential elections on January 25th, Konstantinos Tasoulas, the ruling Nea Dimokratia party's candidate and former parliament speaker, won, breaking the 50-year tradition of consensus-based elections, signaling a rightward shift in the country's politics.
- What are the immediate political implications of Konstantinos Tasoulas's victory in the first round of the Greek presidential elections?
- On January 25th, Greece held the first round of presidential elections. The ruling Nea Dimokratia party's candidate, Konstantinos Tasoulas, won, though further rounds are needed. His victory marks a break from past consensus-based elections.
- How does Tasoulas's election reflect the changing political landscape in Greece, specifically regarding the rise of the right-wing populist parties?
- Tasoulas's win signifies a shift in Greek politics, abandoning the tradition of consensus and compromise in presidential elections. This departure is linked to rising influence of right-wing populist parties, as evidenced by their collective 20% in recent European elections. This suggests that the prime minister is adjusting to a rightward political shift.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of this break with tradition, particularly concerning the future of Greek politics and the role of the president?
- The choice of Tasoulas signals a move towards a more conservative presidency, potentially emboldening right-wing factions within the ruling party and across the political spectrum. His loyalty to the party and the prime minister, Kyriakos Mitsotakis, reduces the likelihood of independent presidential action. The lack of a strong opposition figure is another factor.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the election primarily through the lens of the internal power struggles within Nea Dimokratia. The selection of Tasoulas is presented as a strategic move by Mitsotakis to appease the right wing of his party, rather than a consideration of Tasoulas' qualifications or potential impact as president. This framing emphasizes party politics over broader national interests.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as describing some factions within Nea Dimokratia as "ultra-conservative," "nationalist," and referring to the new candidate's support as coming from the "far-right." These terms carry strong negative connotations, and more neutral terms like "conservative," "nationalist," and "right-wing" could be used to maintain objectivity. The description of one party as 'what's left of it' after multiple splits is emotionally loaded and arguably biased.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the political maneuvering within Nea Dimokratia and the motivations of Prime Minister Mitsotakis, potentially omitting analysis of broader public opinion on the candidates or the significance of the presidential election beyond the internal party dynamics. The perspectives of other political parties beyond their candidate selection are largely absent, limiting a comprehensive understanding of the election's overall impact.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the political spectrum, portraying a clear division between a strengthening right wing and a weak, fragmented left. Nuances within the right wing itself, and potential cross-cutting alliances or disagreements, are not fully explored. The description of the political climate as a simple 'shift to the right' may oversimplify complex political currents.
Gender Bias
While the article mentions the previous president, Katerina Sakellaropoulou, and her progressive views, the reasons for not renominating her are primarily framed through the political calculations of the ruling party. The discussion doesn't delve into a broader discussion of gender representation in Greek politics or evaluate the impact of electing a male president after a female president.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article describes the process of presidential elections in Greece, highlighting the importance of democratic institutions and the transfer of power. The peaceful and orderly nature of the elections, even with differing political viewpoints, demonstrates a functioning democratic system.