Tatarov Denies Allegations of Russia Trips

Tatarov Denies Allegations of Russia Trips

bbc.com

Tatarov Denies Allegations of Russia Trips

An investigative report alleges that Ukrainian presidential aide Oleg Tatarov made multiple trips to Russia after 2014; Tatarov denies the claims.

Ukrainian
United Kingdom
PoliticsRussiaUkraineUkInvestigationControversy
Office Of The President Of UkraineRadio Free Europe/Radio LibertySchemesBbcSbu
Oleg TatarovVolodymyr ZelenskyVadim NovinskyAndriy PortnovVasyl Malyuk
What evidence did "Schemes" use to support their claims?
The report by "Schemes" used border crossing data from Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia to establish the travel dates. Tatarov's response to the accusations was to label the information as fake news and emphasize the gravity of spreading misinformation during wartime.
What criticisms have been raised regarding Tatarov's appointment?
Tatarov's appointment in 2020 sparked criticism due to his past involvement with the authorities during the Euromaidan protests and his representation of controversial figures. President Zelensky has defended Tatarov, highlighting his effectiveness in his role.
What route did Tatarov allegedly use to travel to Moscow after 2014?
The alleged trips took place between 2015 and 2019, with Tatarov traveling through Belarus to circumvent the lack of direct flights between Ukraine and Russia following Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014. Tatarov maintains he never visited Russia and that this information is false.
How many times did Oleg Tatarov allegedly travel to Moscow after 2014?
According to the "Schemes" investigative project, Oleg Tatarov, Deputy Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, visited Moscow at least nine times after 2014. Tatarov denies these claims, calling them fake news.
How has President Zelensky responded to the controversy surrounding Tatarov?
President Zelensky's defense of Tatarov highlights the political sensitivities surrounding this controversy and the deep divisions over his past actions. The conflicting narratives and lack of transparency contribute to continued public debate.